Mon, 30 May 2022 17:34:58 +0200 luacheck: Shut up (backports 3caff1f93520, ignores module deleted in trunk) 0.12
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Mon, 30 May 2022 17:34:58 +0200] rev 12588
luacheck: Shut up (backports 3caff1f93520, ignores module deleted in trunk)
Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:43:47 +0200 Merge 0.12->trunk
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:43:47 +0200] rev 12587
Merge 0.12->trunk
Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:42:48 +0200 Backport 875f73ead4e8 8e4033213c62 to deal with luacheck 0.26 0.12
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:42:48 +0200] rev 12586
Backport 875f73ead4e8 8e4033213c62 to deal with luacheck 0.26
Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:36:07 +0200 Merge 0.12->trunk
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 08 Jul 2022 19:36:07 +0200] rev 12585
Merge 0.12->trunk
Fri, 08 Jul 2022 17:32:48 +0200 util.datamapper: Improve handling of schemas with non-obvious "type" 0.12
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 08 Jul 2022 17:32:48 +0200] rev 12584
util.datamapper: Improve handling of schemas with non-obvious "type" The JSON Schema specification says that schemas are objects or booleans, and that the 'type' property is optional and can be an array. This module previously allowed bare type names as schemas and did not really handle booleans. It now handles missing 'type' properties and boolean 'true' as a schema. Objects and arrays are guessed based on the presence of 'properties' or 'items' field.
Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:38:23 +0200 util.jsonschema: Fix validation to not assume presence of "type" field 0.12
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:38:23 +0200] rev 12583
util.jsonschema: Fix validation to not assume presence of "type" field MattJ reported a curious issue where validation did not work as expected. Primarily that the "type" field was expected to be mandatory, and thus leaving it out would result in no checks being performed. This was likely caused by misreading during initial development. Spent some time testing against https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite.git and discovered a multitude of issues, far too many to bother splitting into separate commits. More than half of them fail. Many because of features not implemented, which have been marked NYI. For example, some require deep comparisons e.g. when objects or arrays are present in enums fields. Some because of quirks with how Lua differs from JavaScript, e.g. no distinct array or object types. Tests involving fractional floating point numbers. We're definitely not going to follow references to remote resources. Or deal with UTF-16 sillyness. One test asserted that 1.0 is an integer, where Lua 5.3+ will disagree.
Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:27:39 +0200 executables: Reject Lua 5.1 early
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:27:39 +0200] rev 12582
executables: Reject Lua 5.1 early Prevents attempting to load libraries that may no longer be found and crashing with a traceback. Platforms like Debian where multiple Lua versions can be installed at the same time and 'lua' pointing to one of the installed interpreters via symlinks, there's the possibility that prosody/prosodyctl may be invoked with Lua 5.1, which will no longer have any of the rest of Prosody libraries available to be require(), and thus would immediately fail with an unfriendly traceback. Checking and aborting early with a friendlier message and reference to more information is better. Part of #1600
Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:59:47 +0200 CHANGES: Lua 5.1 support removed (closes #1600)
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:59:47 +0200] rev 12581
CHANGES: Lua 5.1 support removed (closes #1600)
Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:18:32 +0200 util.envload: Remove Lua 5.1 method
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:18:32 +0200] rev 12580
util.envload: Remove Lua 5.1 method Part of #1600 Is this module even needed anymore?
Fri, 01 Jul 2022 21:21:21 +0200 util-src: Remove Lua 5.1 compat macros
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Fri, 01 Jul 2022 21:21:21 +0200] rev 12579
util-src: Remove Lua 5.1 compat macros Part of #1600
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip