Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:19:38 +0100 util.datamapper: Add references with notes
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:19:38 +0100] rev 11455
util.datamapper: Add references with notes
Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:18:39 +0100 util.datamapper: Add Copyright header
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:18:39 +0100] rev 11454
util.datamapper: Add Copyright header
Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:15:00 +0100 util.jsonschema: Add copyright-header
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:15:00 +0100] rev 11453
util.jsonschema: Add copyright-header
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:31:11 +0100 util.jsonschema: Restructure "type" keyword handling
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:31:11 +0100] rev 11452
util.jsonschema: Restructure "type" keyword handling More in line with the other tests
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:22:33 +0100 util.jsonschema: Syntax tweak to not upset syntax highlighting
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:22:33 +0100] rev 11451
util.jsonschema: Syntax tweak to not upset syntax highlighting That whole condition stanza was shown as angry red, I think it's something with 'enum' being a key word in Teal.
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:43:50 +0100 util.jsonschema: Implement "propertyNames"
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:43:50 +0100] rev 11450
util.jsonschema: Implement "propertyNames" This is a bit special in Lua as tables are not limited to string keys
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:41:47 +0100 util.jsonschema: Restructure handling of "properties" and "additionalProperties"
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:41:47 +0100] rev 11449
util.jsonschema: Restructure handling of "properties" and "additionalProperties" This is a bit cleaner, I think
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:38:51 +0100 util.jsonschema: Fix "uniqueItems" prematurely declaring a match
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:38:51 +0100] rev 11448
util.jsonschema: Fix "uniqueItems" prematurely declaring a match
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:36:08 +0100 util.jsonschema: Implement the "prefixItems" keyword
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:36:08 +0100] rev 11447
util.jsonschema: Implement the "prefixItems" keyword This may have been what got me confused about "items" being an array.
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:35:00 +0100 util.jsonschema: Implement the "contains" keyword
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> [Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:35:00 +0100] rev 11446
util.jsonschema: Implement the "contains" keyword And apparently I had mistaken this for an array
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip