mod_pep: Wipe pubsub service on user deletion
Data is already wiped from storage, but this ensures everything is
properly unsubscribed, possibly with notifications etc.
Clears recipient cache as well, since it is no longer relevant.
local rfc6724 = require "util.rfc6724";
local new_ip = require"util.ip".new_ip;
describe("util.rfc6724", function()
describe("#source()", function()
it("should work", function()
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:3::1",
"prefer appropriate scope");
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("ff05::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:3::1",
"prefer appropriate scope");
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:2::1", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:1::1",
"prefer same address"); -- "2001:db8:1::1" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")}).addr,
"fe80::2",
"prefer appropriate scope"); -- "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated" here, we don't handle that right now
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:1::2",
"longest matching prefix");
--[[ "2001:db8:1::2" should be a care-of address and "2001:db8:3::2" a home address, we can't handle this and would fail
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::2", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:3::2",
"prefer home address");
]]
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8",
"prefer matching label"); -- "2002:c633:6401::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now
assert.are.equal(rfc6724.source(new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:0:0:1", "IPv6"),
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8", "IPv6")}).addr,
"2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8",
"prefer temporary address") -- "2001:db8:1::2" should be marked "public" and "2001:db8:1::d5e3:7953:13eb:22e8" should be marked "temporary" here, we don't handle that right now
end);
end);
describe("#destination()", function()
it("should work", function()
local order;
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("169.254.13.78", "IPv4")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope");
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.121", "IPv4")},
{new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("198.51.100.117", "IPv4")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "198.51.100.121", "prefer matching scope");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching scope");
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.3", "IPv4")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("10.1.2.4", "IPv4")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "10.1.2.3", "prefer higher precedence");
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer smaller scope");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer smaller scope");
--[[ "2001:db8:1::2" and "fe80::2" should be marked "care-of address", while "2001:db8:3::1" should be marked "home address", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer home address");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "prefer home address");
]]
--[[ "fe80::2" should be marked "deprecated", we can't currently handle this and would fail the test
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "avoid deprecated addresses");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "fe80::1", "avoid deprecated addresses");
]]
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3ffe::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:3f44::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "longest matching prefix");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:3ffe::1", "longest matching prefix");
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer matching label");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer matching label");
order = rfc6724.destination({new_ip("2002:c633:6401::1", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::1", "IPv6")},
{new_ip("2002:c633:6401::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("2001:db8:1::2", "IPv6"), new_ip("fe80::2", "IPv6")})
assert.are.equal(order[1].addr, "2001:db8:1::1", "prefer higher precedence");
assert.are.equal(order[2].addr, "2002:c633:6401::1", "prefer higher precedence");
end);
end);
end);