# HG changeset patch # User Pierre-Yves David # Date 1560530224 -3600 # Node ID f461b65866e92a42b463d02b1369b3625e2873e2 # Parent fc8072f38fd660171f49979311709363986d6463 run-tests: extract a `process_out_line` from the main function The main function doing line comparison is quite complex. Slicing it in smaller piece should clarify it. To avoid a huge diff, the code is kept at the same indentation. We'll re-indent in the next changesets. (This is a gratuitous cleanup that I made while investigating a bug). diff -r fc8072f38fd6 -r f461b65866e9 tests/run-tests.py --- a/tests/run-tests.py Sun Sep 08 10:08:41 2019 +0200 +++ b/tests/run-tests.py Fri Jun 14 17:37:04 2019 +0100 @@ -1616,6 +1616,24 @@ if salt in out_rawline: out_line, cmd_line = out_rawline.split(salt, 1) + pos, postout, warnonly = self._process_out_line(out_line, + pos, + postout, + expected, + warnonly) + pos, postout = self._process_cmd_line(cmd_line, pos, postout, + after) + + if pos in after: + postout += after.pop(pos) + + if warnonly == WARN_YES: + exitcode = False # Set exitcode to warned. + + return exitcode, postout + + def _process_out_line(self, out_line, pos, postout, expected, warnonly): + if True: while out_line: if not out_line.endswith(b'\n'): out_line += b' (no-eol)\n' @@ -1694,16 +1712,7 @@ else: continue postout.append(b' ' + el) - - pos, postout = self._process_cmd_line(cmd_line, pos, postout, after) - - if pos in after: - postout += after.pop(pos) - - if warnonly == WARN_YES: - exitcode = False # Set exitcode to warned. - - return exitcode, postout + return pos, postout, warnonly def _process_cmd_line(self, cmd_line, pos, postout, after): """process a "command" part of a line from unified test output"""