test-http-bad-server: use the new pattern-reading for a test-case This test case is now less sensitive to change of unrelated bits of the client/server exchange. Since this introduce some churn in the output, we do it independently for each test cases. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12070

test-http-bad-server: use the new pattern-reading for a test-case This test case is now less sensitive to change of unrelated bits of the client/server exchange. Since this introduce some churn in the output, we do it independently for each test cases. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12069

test-http-bad-server: introduce socket closing after reading a pattern We introduce the `close-after-recv-patterns` option. It has the same goal as `close-after-send-patterns` with a slightly different implementation. Reading "up to a pattern" is hard. As we can only check the pattern from what we have already read (inlike writing, were we can check what we are about to write). So instead we make the `close-after-recv-patterns` alter the behavior of the existing `close-after-recv-bytes`. The value from `close-after-recv-bytes` only gets into play after we have seen the pattern from `close-after-recv-patterns`. This allow us to achieve the target benefit without changing the read pattern too much. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12068

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12067

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12066

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12065

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12064

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12063

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12062

test-http-bad-server: move on test from bytes-count to pattern This specific test case is now using the new "close when a pattern is seen" approach compared to the more fragile "that many bytes were sent" approach. Since such change are still a bit noisy, we split each change in there own changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12061