Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:34:28 +0300 discovery: drop some unused sets
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:34:28 +0300] rev 42027
discovery: drop some unused sets Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6145
Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:29:23 +0300 discovery: prevent recomputing info about server and outgoing changesets
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:29:23 +0300] rev 42026
discovery: prevent recomputing info about server and outgoing changesets We already iterate over the outgoing.missing above and lookup repo for them. So let's reuse info calculated at that time instead of recomputing that again. Also we calculate the set of remotebranches by doing set(remotemap), so let's reuse that again. Upcoming patches will clean things a bit more. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6144
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:44:29 +0100 crecord: draw on the whole screen
Alexander Kobjolke <alex@jakalx.net> [Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:44:29 +0100] rev 42025
crecord: draw on the whole screen When starting crecord, one can see that it has a small gap on the rightmost column which doesn't get used. This is in contrast to other interactive curses frontends such as chistedit. Disabling the displaying of the cursor allows drawing on the whole availabe area and thus some hacky code in align() could be removed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6171
Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:24:08 -0700 automation: perform tasks on remote machines
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:24:08 -0700] rev 42024
automation: perform tasks on remote machines Sometimes you don't have access to a machine in order to do something. For example, you may not have access to a Windows machine required to build Windows binaries or run tests on that platform. This commit introduces a pile of code intended to help "automate" common tasks, like building release artifacts. In its current form, the automation code provides functionality for performing tasks on Windows EC2 instances. The hgautomation.aws module provides functionality for integrating with AWS. It manages EC2 resources such as IAM roles, EC2 security groups, AMIs, and instances. The hgautomation.windows module provides a higher-level interface for performing tasks on remote Windows machines. The hgautomation.cli module provides a command-line interface to these higher-level primitives. I attempted to structure Windows remote machine interaction around Windows Remoting / PowerShell. This is kinda/sorta like SSH + shell, but for Windows. In theory, most of the functionality is cloud provider agnostic, as we should be able to use any established WinRM connection to interact with a remote. In reality, we're tightly coupled to AWS at the moment because I didn't want to prematurely add abstractions for a 2nd cloud provider. (1 was hard enough to implement.) In the aws module is code for creating an image with a fully functional Mercurial development environment. It contains VC9, VC2017, msys, and other dependencies. The image is fully capable of building all the existing Mercurial release artifacts and running tests. There are a few things that don't work. For example, running Windows tests with Python 3. But building the Windows release artifacts does work. And that was an impetus for this work. (Although we don't yet support code signing.) Getting this functionality to work was extremely time consuming. It took hours debugging permissions failures and other wonky behavior due to PowerShell Remoting. (The permissions model for PowerShell is crazy and you brush up against all kinds of issues because of the user/privileges of the user running the PowerShell and the permissions of the PowerShell session itself.) The functionality around AWS resource management could use some improving. In theory we support shared tenancy via resource name prefixing. In reality, we don't offer a way to configure this. Speaking of AWS resource management, I thought about using a tool like Terraform to manage resources. But at our scale, writing a few dozen lines of code to manage resources seemed acceptable. Maybe we should reconsider this if things grow out of control. Time will tell. Currently, emphasis is placed on Windows. But I only started there because it was likely to be the most difficult to implement. It should be relatively trivial to automate tasks on remote Linux machines. In fact, I have a ~1 year old script to run tests on a remote EC2 instance. I will likely be porting that to this new "framework" in the near future. # no-check-commit because foo_bar functions Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6142
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:36:08 -0800 contrib: PowerShell script to install development dependencies
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:36:08 -0800] rev 42023
contrib: PowerShell script to install development dependencies Configuring a Windows machine to hack on Mercurial is a bit of work and it isn't documented very well. This commit introduces a PowerShell script to automate going from a fresh Windows install to an environment suitable for building Mercurial, its installers, and running tests. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6141
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:53:30 -0400 chistedit: change in-progress message
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:53:30 -0400] rev 42022
chistedit: change in-progress message Saying "running histedit" is an artifact of when chistedit was a separate thing from histedit. I found the message a bit confusing, since wasn't I running histedit from the beginning, just from the curses interface? The whole thing is now histedit, both the curses interface and the underlying procedure to apply a plan, so let's use a message that doesn't make a distinction.
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:21:17 -0400 perf: copyedit a few documentation strings
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:21:17 -0400] rev 42021
perf: copyedit a few documentation strings Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6170
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 20:13:13 -0400 shelve: add --keep to list of allowables
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 20:13:13 -0400] rev 42020
shelve: add --keep to list of allowables
Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:30:52 +0000 perf: introduce a `perf.run-limits` options
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Mar 2019 12:30:52 +0000] rev 42019
perf: introduce a `perf.run-limits` options This options make it possible to configure the number of run that the extensions will perform. This is useful for automated benchmark or for performance measurement that need better accuracy.
Sat, 16 Mar 2019 19:11:19 +0000 perf: pass limits as a function argument
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Mar 2019 19:11:19 +0000] rev 42018
perf: pass limits as a function argument The function applying the limit has no access to the configuration. Therefore, some higher layer will have to pass it as argument. We do this in an independent change to clarify the next change.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip