Sun, 27 May 2012 09:52:25 -0300 i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with 0a730d3c5aae stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@yahoo.com> [Sun, 27 May 2012 09:52:25 -0300] rev 16796
i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with 0a730d3c5aae
Wed, 23 May 2012 21:34:29 +0200 merge: show renamed on one and deleted on the other side in debug output
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Wed, 23 May 2012 21:34:29 +0200] rev 16795
merge: show renamed on one and deleted on the other side in debug output
Wed, 23 May 2012 20:50:16 +0200 merge: warn about file deleted in one branch and renamed in other (issue3074)
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Wed, 23 May 2012 20:50:16 +0200] rev 16794
merge: warn about file deleted in one branch and renamed in other (issue3074) For divergent renames the following message is printed during merge: note: possible conflict - file was renamed multiple times to: newfile file2 When a file is renamed in one branch and deleted in the other, the file still exists after a merge. With this change a similar message is printed for mv+rm: note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to: newfile
Wed, 23 May 2012 17:33:19 +0200 tests: do not create repos inside repos in test-rename-merge1.t
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Wed, 23 May 2012 17:33:19 +0200] rev 16793
tests: do not create repos inside repos in test-rename-merge1.t This is no actual problem, but I when adding more tests to this file, the directory structure would become t/repo2089/repoXXXX/repoYYYY/...
Wed, 23 May 2012 17:25:48 +0200 merge: do not warn about copy and rename in the same transaction (issue2113)
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Wed, 23 May 2012 17:25:48 +0200] rev 16792
merge: do not warn about copy and rename in the same transaction (issue2113)
Wed, 30 May 2012 14:21:58 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 30 May 2012 14:21:58 -0500] rev 16791
merge with stable
Wed, 30 May 2012 14:13:57 -0500 revpair: handle odd ranges (issue3474) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 30 May 2012 14:13:57 -0500] rev 16790
revpair: handle odd ranges (issue3474)
Wed, 23 May 2012 00:25:29 +0900 match: make 'match.files()' return list object always stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 23 May 2012 00:25:29 +0900] rev 16789
match: make 'match.files()' return list object always 'exact' match objects are sometimes created with a non-list 'pattern' argument: - using 'set' in queue.refresh():hgext/mq.py match = scmutil.matchfiles(repo, set(c[0] + c[1] + c[2] + inclsubs)) - using 'dict' in revert():mercurial/cmdutil.py (names = {}) m = scmutil.matchfiles(repo, names) 'exact' match objects return specified 'pattern' to callers of 'match.files()' as it is, so it is a non-list object. but almost all implementations expect 'match.files()' to return a list object, so this may causes problems: e.g. exception for "+" with another list object. this patch ensures that '_files' of 'exact' match objects is a list object. for non 'exact' match objects, parsing specified 'pattern' already ensures that it it a list one.
Wed, 16 May 2012 13:45:46 -0700 perf: add a perfdirstatewrite benchmark
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Wed, 16 May 2012 13:45:46 -0700] rev 16788
perf: add a perfdirstatewrite benchmark
Sat, 19 May 2012 20:21:48 -0700 parsers: cache the result of index_headrevs
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Sat, 19 May 2012 20:21:48 -0700] rev 16787
parsers: cache the result of index_headrevs Although index_headrevs is much faster than its Python counterpart, it's still somewhat expensive when history is large. Since headrevs is called several times when the tag cache is stale or missing (e.g. after a strip or rebase), there's a win to be gained from caching the result, which we do here.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip