Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:17:58 +0100 debugupgraderepo: add a --no-backup mode
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:17:58 +0100] rev 41089
debugupgraderepo: add a --no-backup mode The process has been around for a while and is pretty safe now. Having an automated way to clean up the old data is useful when running many different conversion to compare delta algorithm.
Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:05:30 +0200 upgrade: add '-' in optimization name
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:05:30 +0200] rev 41088
upgrade: add '-' in optimization name The older name `redeltaall` was hard to type and read. The newer form should be more user-friendly. We keep backward compatibility with the old form (at least for a while). Having to use different form depending on the version is very impractical and error prone.
Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:27:30 +0100 revlog: add test case for _findsnapshots
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:27:30 +0100] rev 41087
revlog: add test case for _findsnapshots Testing the method directly is more robust.
Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:27:38 +0100 revlog: use the native implementation of issnapshot
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:27:38 +0100] rev 41086
revlog: use the native implementation of issnapshot In some sparserevlog case where a lot of the history has to be searched for a snapshot, the cost of issnashot cost becomes significant. The computation done by the method is fairly low level, a native implementation provide a very significant speedup. example affected manifest write before: 0.490375s after: 0.114989s (-76%)
Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:57:13 +0100 revlog: add a native implementation of issnapshot
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:57:13 +0100] rev 41085
revlog: add a native implementation of issnapshot This will be used in the next changesets
Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:51:36 +0100 revlog: more efficient implementation for issnapshot
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:51:36 +0100] rev 41084
revlog: more efficient implementation for issnapshot We avoid multiple method calls and tuple creation, this provides a significant speedup in some case: example affected manifest write before: 0.815520s after: 0.487767s (-40%)
Sun, 30 Dec 2018 16:14:42 +0100 revlog: clarify the non sparse-revlog case in `issnapshot`
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Sun, 30 Dec 2018 16:14:42 +0100] rev 41083
revlog: clarify the non sparse-revlog case in `issnapshot` If we are not using sparse-revlog, there is only one type of snapshot, the full one.
Sun, 30 Dec 2018 22:46:54 -0500 exthelper: switch to using the registrar merging method
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 30 Dec 2018 22:46:54 -0500] rev 41082
exthelper: switch to using the registrar merging method
Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:52:26 -0500 registrar: add a method to merge registrar instances
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:52:26 -0500] rev 41081
registrar: add a method to merge registrar instances This provides sanity checking beyond simply merging the underlying dictionaries.
Sat, 29 Dec 2018 01:51:02 -0500 phabricator: ensure that the return of urlopener.open() is closed
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 29 Dec 2018 01:51:02 -0500] rev 41080
phabricator: ensure that the return of urlopener.open() is closed No problem observed, just an oversight noticed while reading documentation.
Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:59:16 +0100 revlog: fix pure python slicing test when chain contains nullrev
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:59:16 +0100] rev 41079
revlog: fix pure python slicing test when chain contains nullrev The revlog mock used in the test was not behaving the same as its C counterpart.
Sun, 30 Dec 2018 17:31:57 +0900 merge with stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 30 Dec 2018 17:31:57 +0900] rev 41078
merge with stable
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:19:46 -0800 remotefilelog: fix bug in maybesparsematch returning alwaysmatcher
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:19:46 -0800] rev 41077
remotefilelog: fix bug in maybesparsematch returning alwaysmatcher The description of the method says that it should return None if sparse is not used in this repository; since sparse.matcher() returns alwaysmatcher if sparse is not enabled, I'm using that as the signal to return None here to preserve the previous behavior. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5487
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:51:47 -0800 procutil: correct spelling of uninterruptable -> uninterruptible
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:51:47 -0800] rev 41076
procutil: correct spelling of uninterruptable -> uninterruptible Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5488
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:14:10 -0500 help: show advanced, experimental and deprecated extensions with --verbose
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:14:10 -0500] rev 41075
help: show advanced, experimental and deprecated extensions with --verbose I noticed that phabricator and absorb weren't showing up, no matter what. There's a related problem where commands for these extensions *do* show up without --verbose. I'm not sure what the point of hiding the extensions, but not the commands is.
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:45:27 -0500 help: remove a duplicate category name entry for TOPIC_CATEGORY_NONE
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:45:27 -0500] rev 41074
help: remove a duplicate category name entry for TOPIC_CATEGORY_NONE
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:33:13 -0500 phabricator: assign commands to help categories
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:33:13 -0500] rev 41073
phabricator: assign commands to help categories `phabsend` and `phabupdate` seem pretty close to `email`. `phabread` is a little less close, but can be trivially used to actually import patches.
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:53:58 -0500 largefiles: eliminate an unnecessary import of configitems
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:53:58 -0500] rev 41072
largefiles: eliminate an unnecessary import of configitems Thanks to Yuya for pointing this out.
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500 exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500] rev 41071
exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases Maybe it's my general lack of python knowledge, but how to use these would be way too obscure for me otherwise.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500] rev 41070
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500] rev 41069
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage. This also seems to make the test failure around issue6033 mentioned in 0a7f582f6f1f much less regular on Windows.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500 extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API)
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500] rev 41068
extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API) 9.5 years should be enough time, but there were some tests for the old style still (which are now updated). Exthelper doesn't fallback to the old API, so this is for consistency. .. api:: The extension hook ``extsetup`` without a `ui` argument has been deprecated, and will be removed in the next version. Add a `ui` argument to avoid the deprecation warning.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500 largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500] rev 41067
largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper This tests the merge code that wasn't tested in the previous patch.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500] rev 41066
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the extension name supplied when registering. The test needed updating so that extsetup() takes a `ui` argument, as exthelper isn't trying to be backward compatible with 1.3.1. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500 largefiles: drop the uisetup module
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500] rev 41065
largefiles: drop the uisetup module This is small enough to live in the __init__ module.
Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:04:37 +0530 branches: add -r option to show branch name(s) of a given rev (issue5948)
Navaneeth Suresh <navaneeths1998@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:04:37 +0530] rev 41064
branches: add -r option to show branch name(s) of a given rev (issue5948) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5486
Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:06:58 +0000 progress: avoid ui.configbool() lookup when progress bar is active
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:06:58 +0000] rev 41063
progress: avoid ui.configbool() lookup when progress bar is active Profiling revealed that the ui.configbool('progress', 'debug') during progress bar updates was consuming a significant amount of overhead. This commit adds an attribute on progress bar instances that caches this config option. The impact on `hg perfprogress` with default options is significant: before: ! wall 4.641942 comb 4.580000 user 4.210000 sys 0.370000 (best of 3) after: ! wall 1.948626 comb 1.950000 user 1.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5) After this change, profiling reveals that progress.progbar.progress() is now consuming ~73% of time. This change does not improve the execution time if the progress bar is disabled. We may want a more comprehensive solution for that case, as the progress bar won't be enabled in a number of scenarios (e.g. servers and processes not attached to an interactive TTY). I also think that overhead of ~2.0s for 1M updates is a bit high. I suspect further refactoring of the progress bar can significantly reduce overhead. I don't have plans to do this, however. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5408
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:57:03 -0500 largefiles: port wrapped functions to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:57:03 -0500] rev 41062
largefiles: port wrapped functions to exthelper Things get interesting in the commit. I hadn't seen issue6033 on Windows, and yet it is now reproducible 100% of the time on Windows 10 with this commit. I didn't test Linux. (For comparison, after seeing this issue, I tested on the parent with --loop, and it failed 5 times out of over 1300 tests.) The strange thing is that largefiles has nothing to do with that test (it's not even mentioned there). It isn't autoloading run amuck- it occurs even if largefiles is explicitly disabled, and also if the entry in afterhgrcload() is commented out. It's also not the import of lfutil- I disabled that by copying the function into lfs and removing the import, and the problem still occurs. Experimenting further, it seems that the problem is isolated to 3 entries: exchange.pushoperation, hg.clone, and cmdutil.revert. If those decorators are all commented out, the test passes when run in a loop for awhile. (Obviously, some largefiles tests will fail.) But if any one is commented back in, the test fails immediately. I left one method related to wrapping the wire protocol, because it seemed more natural with the TODO. Also, exthelper doesn't support wrapping functions from another extension, only commands in another extension. I didn't try to figure out why rebase is both command wrapped and function wrapped.
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:26:25 -0500 largefiles: port commands to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:26:25 -0500] rev 41061
largefiles: port commands to exthelper One subtle change here is that the purge, rebase and transplant extensions are wrapped in extsetup() instead of uisetup().
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:54:56 -0500 exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:54:56 -0500] rev 41060
exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command Largefiles uses this 5th argument with push and pull, so this will be tested in the next commit. I assume the reason for unrolling and reforming the tuple in each finalxxxsetup() is to validate that something proper was passed in when registering. But it's better to explode when decorating than during the delayed actual registration.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip