Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:52:05 +0100 rust-index: allow inlining VCSGraph parents across crates
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:52:05 +0100] rev 51258
rust-index: allow inlining VCSGraph parents across crates
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:48:07 +0100 rust-index: allow inlining `parents` across crates
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:48:07 +0100] rev 51257
rust-index: allow inlining `parents` across crates
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:47:42 +0100 rust-index: allow inlining `check_revision` across crates
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:47:42 +0100] rev 51256
rust-index: allow inlining `check_revision` across crates
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:41:58 +0100 rust-index: document safety invariants being upheld for every `unsafe` block
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:41:58 +0100] rev 51255
rust-index: document safety invariants being upheld for every `unsafe` block We've added a lot of `unsafe` code that shares Rust structs with Python. While this is unfortunate, it is also unavoidable, so let's at least systematically explain why each call to `unsafe` is sound. If any of the unsafe code ends up being wrong (because everyone screws up at some point), this change at least continues the unspoken rule of always explaining the need for `unsafe`, so we at least get a chance to think.
Sun, 29 Oct 2023 12:18:03 +0100 rust-index: renamed `MixedIndex` as `Index`
Georges Racinet on incendie.racinet.fr <georges@racinet.fr> [Sun, 29 Oct 2023 12:18:03 +0100] rev 51254
rust-index: renamed `MixedIndex` as `Index` It is simply not mixed any more, hence the name had become a future source of confusion.
Sun, 29 Oct 2023 23:54:05 +0100 rust-index: stop instantiating a C Index
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Sun, 29 Oct 2023 23:54:05 +0100] rev 51253
rust-index: stop instantiating a C Index The only missing piece was the `cache` to be returned from `revlog.parse_index_v1_mixed`, and it really seems that it is essentially repetition of the input, if `inline` is `True`. Not worth a Rust implementation (C implementation is probably there for historical reasons).
Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:28:30 +0100 rust-revlog: using the ad-hoc `NodeTree` in scmutil
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:28:30 +0100] rev 51252
rust-revlog: using the ad-hoc `NodeTree` in scmutil Now that we have an independent `NodeTree` class able to work natively on the pure Rust index, we use it in `mercurial.scmutil`, with automatic invalidation after mutation of the index. This code path is tested by `test-revisions.t` and `test-template-functions.t`
Mon, 30 Oct 2023 22:36:30 +0100 rust-revlog: add invalidation detection to `NodeTree` class
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 30 Oct 2023 22:36:30 +0100] rev 51251
rust-revlog: add invalidation detection to `NodeTree` class This will be useful for callers, such as `scmutil` who reuse a `NodeTree` instance as a cache. They would otherwise get hard errors if any mutation of the index occurred since instantiation. This is something the C index does not provide.
Thu, 02 Nov 2023 15:50:13 +0100 rust-index: add support for `del index[r]`
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 02 Nov 2023 15:50:13 +0100] rev 51250
rust-index: add support for `del index[r]` Only the `del index[r:]` syntax was supported, but the comment said otherwise. It's not actually used in core code, but the C index supports it.
Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:26:17 +0100 rust-revlog: bare minimal NodeTree exposition
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:26:17 +0100] rev 51249
rust-revlog: bare minimal NodeTree exposition The independent `NodeTree` instances needs to be associated to an index (for forward-checks of candidates) but do not need to encompass all revisions from that index. This is exactly how it is used in `scmutil.shortesthenodeidprefix` and we restrict the implementation to the bare minimum needed there and to write convincing tests. It would of course be fairly trivial to add more.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip