Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:52:22 -0800 merge: extract method for checking for conflicting untracked file
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:52:22 -0800] rev 23655
merge: extract method for checking for conflicting untracked file Now that the functionality is collected in one place, let's extract it to a method.
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:45:19 -0800 merge: create 'cm' action for 'get or merge' case
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:45:19 -0800] rev 23654
merge: create 'cm' action for 'get or merge' case We still have one case of a call to _checkunknownfile() in manifestmerge(): when force=True and branchmerge=True and the remote side has a file that the local side doesn't. This combination of arguments is used by 'hg merge --force', but also by rebase and unshelve. In this scenario, we try to create the file from the contents from the remote, but if there is already a local untracked file in place, we merge it instead.
Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:18:36 -0800 merge: don't overwrite untracked file at directory rename target
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:18:36 -0800] rev 23653
merge: don't overwrite untracked file at directory rename target When a directory was renamed and a new untracked file was added in the new directory and the remote directory added a file by the same name in the old directory, the local untracked file gets overwritten, as demonstrated by the broken test case in test-rename-dir-merge. Fix by checking for unknown files for 'dg' actions too. Since _checkunknownfile() currently expects the same filename in both contexts, we need to add a new parameter for the remote filename to it.
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:29:25 -0800 merge: remove constant tuple element from 'aborts'
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:29:25 -0800] rev 23652
merge: remove constant tuple element from 'aborts' The second element of the tuples in the 'aborts' list is always 'ud', so let's remove it.
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:51:31 -0800 merge: collect checking for unknown files at end of manifestmerge()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:51:31 -0800] rev 23651
merge: collect checking for unknown files at end of manifestmerge() The 'c' and 'dc' actions include creating a file on disk and we need to check that no conflicting file exists unless force=True. Move two of the calls to _checkunknownfile() to a single place at the end of manifestmerge(). This removes some of the reading of filelogs from the heart of manifestmerge() and collects it in one place close to where its output (entries in the 'aborts' list) is used. Note that this removes the unnecessary call to _checkunknownfile() when force=True in one of the code paths.
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:48:30 -0800 merge: introduce 'c' action like 'g', but with additional safety
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:48:30 -0800] rev 23650
merge: introduce 'c' action like 'g', but with additional safety _checkunknownfile() reads the filelog of the remote side's file. For narrow clones, the filelog will not exist for all files and we need a way to avoid reading them. While it would be easier for the narrow extension to just override _checkunknownfile() and make it ignore files outside the narrow clone, it seems cleaner to have manifestmerge() not care about filelogs (considering its name). In order to move the calls to _checkunknownfile() out, we need to be able to tell in which cases we should check for unknown files. Let's start by introducing a new action distinct from 'g' for this purpose. Specifically, the new action will be just like 'g' except that it will check that for conflicting unknown files first. For now, just add the new action type and convert it to 'g'.
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:00 -0800 merge: structure 'remote created' code to match table
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:00 -0800] rev 23649
merge: structure 'remote created' code to match table This does duplicate the call to _checkunknownfile(), but it will simplify future patches.
Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:48:39 -0800 pushkey: run hook after the lock release
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:48:39 -0800] rev 23648
pushkey: run hook after the lock release The pushkey operation used to be in its own wireprotocol command and (in practice) always be lock free when running the hook. With bundle2, it happen in a greater scheme and a hook running locking command would get stuck. We now run such hooks after the lock release as similar hook do. Bundle2 test are altered to ensure we are lockfree at hook running time.
Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:31:28 -0800 setup: use changes since latest tag instead of just distance
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:31:28 -0800] rev 23647
setup: use changes since latest tag instead of just distance For a Mercurial built on the merge from stable into default right after 3.2.2 was released -- 19ebd2f88fc7 -- the version number produced was "3.2.2+4". This is potentially misleading, since in reality the built Mercurial includes many more changes compared to 3.2.2. Change the versioning scheme so that we take into consideration all the changes present in the current revision that aren't present in the latest tag. For 19ebd2f88fc7 the new versioning scheme results in a version number of "3.2.2+256". This gives users a much better idea of how many changes have actually happened since the latest release. Since changessincelatesttag is always greater than or equal to the latesttagdistance, this will produce version numbers that are always greater than or equal to the old scheme. Thus there's minimal compatibility risk.
Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:39 -0800 setup: use changessincelatesttag from archive if present
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:39 -0800] rev 23646
setup: use changessincelatesttag from archive if present changessincelatesttag gives one a better idea of how much the code has changed since. Since changessincelatesttag is always greater than or equal to the latesttagdistance (see previous patch for why), this will always produce version numbers greater than or equal to the previous scheme.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip