Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:05:32 +0100 discovery: indices between sample and yesno must match (issue4438) stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:05:32 +0100] rev 23192
discovery: indices between sample and yesno must match (issue4438) 3ef893520a85 changed 'sample' from a list to a set. The iteration order is thus undefined and the yesno indices are not stable. To solve this, repeat the listification and comment from elsewhere in the code. Note: the randomness in the discovery protocol can make this problem hard to reproduce.
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:05:29 +0100 discovery: limit 'all local heads known remotely' to real 'all' (issue4438) stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:05:29 +0100] rev 23191
discovery: limit 'all local heads known remotely' to real 'all' (issue4438) 3ef893520a85 made it possible that the initial head check didn't include all heads. If that is the case, don't use the early exit just because this random sample happened to be 'all known'. Note: the randomness in the discovery protocol can make this problem hard to reproduce.
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: avoid printing messages while rebasing by "_lfstatuswriters"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23190
largefiles: avoid printing messages while rebasing by "_lfstatuswriters" Putting "lambda *msg, **opts: None" (= avoid printing messages always) into "_lfstatuswriters" while rebasing makes explicit passing "printmessage = False" for "updatelfiles()" useless. This patch also removes setting/unsetting "repo._isrebasing" in "overriderebase", because there is no code path referring it.
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: get function to write status messages via "getstatuswriter()"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23189
largefiles: get function to write status messages via "getstatuswriter()" This patch makes "updatelfiles()" get appropriate function to write largefiles specific status messages via "getstatuswriter()". This patch introduces None as "print messages if needed", because True (forcibly writing) and False (forcibly ignoring) are already used for "printmessage" of "updatelfiles". Subsequent patch will move "avoid printing messages only while automated committing" decision from caller of "updatelfiles()" into "getstatuswriter()".
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: introduce "_lfstatuswriters" to customize status reporting
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23188
largefiles: introduce "_lfstatuswriters" to customize status reporting "lfutil.getstatuswriter" is the utility to get appropriate function to write largefiles specific status out from "repo._lfstatuswriters". This patch uses "stack" with an element instead of flag like "_isXXXXing" or so, because: - the former works correctly even when customizations are nested, and - ensuring at least one element can ignore empty check
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: update standins only at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23187
largefiles: update standins only at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue" Before this patch, "hg rebase --continue" may record incorrect standins, because largefiles extension always avoid updating standins while rebasing, even though largefiles in the working directory may be modified manually at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue". But, on the other hand, updating standins should be avoided at subsequent commits for efficiency reason. To update standins only at the 1st commit of "hg rebase --continue", this patch introduces state-full callable object "automatedcommithook", which updates standins by "lfutil.updatestandinsbymatch()" only at the 1st commit of resuming. Even after this patch, "repo._isrebasing = True" is still needed to avoid some status report while updating largefiles in "lfcommands.updatelfiles()". This is reason why this patch omits not "repo._isrebasing = True" in "overriderebase" but examination of "getattr(repo, "_isrebasing", False)" in "updatestandinsbymatch".
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: introduce "_lfcommithooks" to abstract pre-committing procedures
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23186
largefiles: introduce "_lfcommithooks" to abstract pre-committing procedures This changes allows to customize pre-committing procedures according to conditions. This patch uses "stack" with an element instead of flag like "_isXXXXing" or so, because: - the former works correctly even when customizations are nested, and - ensuring at least one element can ignore empty check
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: factor out procedures to update standins for pre-committing
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23185
largefiles: factor out procedures to update standins for pre-committing This patch factors out procedures to update standins for pre-committing. This is one of preparations to avoid execution of such procedures according to invocation context. For example, resuming automated committing (e.g. "hg rebase --continue") should update standins at the 1st commit, because largefiles in the working directory may be modified manually. But on the other hand, it should avoid updating standins at subsequent committings for efficiency reason. For simplicity, this patch just moves procedures mechanically only with replacing below. - "self" => "repo" - "lfutil." => (none) - "orig" invocation => returning "match" Using "fstandin" instead "standin" as the name of local variable for the loop below is the only special care, because the latter shadows the same name function in "lfutil.py". [before] for standin in standins: lfile = lfutil.splitstandin(standin) if lfdirstate[lfile] != 'r': lfutil.updatestandin(self, standin) [after] for fstandin in standins: lfile = splitstandin(fstandin) if lfdirstate[lfile] != 'r': updatestandin(repo, fstandin)
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: factor out procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23184
largefiles: factor out procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing Before this patch, procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing are scattered in "lfilesrepo.commit". In the case of "hg commit" with patterns for target files ("Case 2"), lfdirstate is updated BEFORE real committing. This patch factors out procedures to update lfdirstate for post-committing into "lfutil.markcommitted", and makes it callable via "markcommitted" of the context passed to "lfilesrepo.commitctx". "markcommitted" of the context is called, only when it is committed successfully. Passing original "markcommitted" of the context is meaningless in this patch, but required in subsequent one to prepare something before invocation of it.
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900 largefiles: remove meaningless code path for "hg pull --rebase"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:24:47 +0900] rev 23183
largefiles: remove meaningless code path for "hg pull --rebase" This patch removes "--rebase" specific code path for "hg pull" in "overridepull", because previous patch makes it meaningless: now, "rebase.rebase" ("orig" invocation in this patch) can update/commit largefiles safely without "repo._isrebasing = True". As a side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation in "overridepull", this patch removes "nothing to rebase ..." message in "test-largefiles.t", which is shown only when rebase extension is enabled AFTER largefiles: before this patch: 1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull" at first, because rebase wraps "hg pull" later 2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig", even though rebase assumes that "orig" is "pull" of commands 3. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" directly 3.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X" 3.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent "Y" on "X" 4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase" 5. "pullrebase" tries to rebase, but there is nothing to be done, because "Y" is already rebased on "X". then, it shows "nothing to rebase ..." after this patch: 1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull" 2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig" 3. "overridepull" executes "pull" as "orig" 4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase" 5. revision "Y" is not yet rebased, so "pullrebase" doesn't shows "nothing to rebase ..." As another side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation, this patch fixes issue3861, which occurs only when rebase extension is enabled BEFORE largefiles: before this patch: 1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first, because largefiles wrap "hg pull" later 2. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" explicitly 2.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X" 2.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent, but fails because no revision is checked out in issue3861 case 3. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 1 returned from "rebase" at (2.2) 4. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 1 unexpectedly after this patch: 1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first 2. "overridepull" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "orig" 3. "pullrebase" invokes "pull" as "orig" 4. "pullrebase" invokes "rebase", and it fails 5. "pullrebase" returns to "overridepull" with exit code 0 (because "pullrebase" ignores result of "pull" and "rebase") 6. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 0 returned from "rebase" at (5) 7. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 0
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip