Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:21:30 -0700 run-tests: report code coverage from source directory
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:21:30 -0700] rev 24506
run-tests: report code coverage from source directory As part of testing code coverage output, I noticed some files were being reported twice: there was an entry for the file in the install location and for the file in the source tree. I'm not sure why this is. But it resulted in under-reporting of coverage data since some lines weren't getting covered in both locations. I also noticed that files in the source directory and outside the "mercurial" and "hgext" packages were getting included in the coverage report. Cosmetically, this seemed odd to me. It's not difficult to filter paths from the report. But I figure this data can be useful (we could start reporting run-tests.py coverage, for example). This patch switches the coverage API to report code coverage from the source directory. It registers a path alias so that data from the install location is merged into data from the source directory. We now get merged results for files that were being reported in multiple locations. Since code coverage reporting now relies on the profiled install now being in sync with the source tree, an additional check to disallow code coverage when --with-hg is specified has been added. This should have been present before, as --local was previously disallowed for the same reasons. Merging the paths raises our aggregate line coverage from ~60 to 81%.
Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:47:58 -0700 run-tests: collect aggregate code coverage
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:47:58 -0700] rev 24505
run-tests: collect aggregate code coverage Before this patch, every Python process during a code coverage run was writing coverage data to the same file. I'm not sure if the coverage package even tries to obtain a lock on the file. But what I do know is there was some last write wins leading to loss of code coverage data, at least with -j > 1. This patch changes the code coverage mechanism to be multiple process safe. The mechanism for initializing code coverage via sitecustomize.py has been tweaked so each Python process will produce a separate coverage data file on disk. Unless two processes generate the same random value, there are no race conditions writing to the same file. At the end of the test run, we combine all written files into an aggregate report. On my machine, running the full test suite produces a little over 20,000 coverage files consuming ~350 MB. As you can imagine, it takes several seconds to load and merge these coverage files. But when it is done, you have an accurate picture of the aggregate code coverage for the entire test suite, which is ~60% line coverage.
Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:17:19 -0700 run-tests: obtain code coverage via Python API
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:17:19 -0700] rev 24504
run-tests: obtain code coverage via Python API Before, we were invoking the "coverage" program provided by the "coverage" module. This patch changes the code to go through the Python API. This makes the next patch a little bit easier to reason about. A side effect of this patch is that writing code coverage reports will be slightly faster, as we won't have to redundantly load coverage data.
Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:58:44 -0700 commands.debugrevlog: report max chain length
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:58:44 -0700] rev 24503
commands.debugrevlog: report max chain length This is sometimes useful to know. Report it.
Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:55:54 -0700 _lazymanifest: drop unnecessary call to sorted()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:55:54 -0700] rev 24502
_lazymanifest: drop unnecessary call to sorted() The entries returned from _lazymanifest.iterentries() are already sorted.
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 00:00:14 -0400 test-git-export: add globs the test runner wants on Windows
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 29 Mar 2015 00:00:14 -0400] rev 24501
test-git-export: add globs the test runner wants on Windows The only difference for the first two was to add the globs, but the third line of output on Windows was '..\dir2\copy'. I'm not sure why 'copy' is output on Windows instead of '*'.
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:41:23 -0700 run-tests: explicitly handle unicode when writing xunit file
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:41:23 -0700] rev 24500
run-tests: explicitly handle unicode when writing xunit file The xunit writer was passing a str to a minidom API. An implicit .decode('ascii') was performed somewhere, causing UnicodeDecodeError if test output contained non-ascii sequences. This patch converts test output to utf-8 before passing it to minidom. We use the "replace" strategy to ensure invalid utf-8 sequences get munged into �.
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:06:23 +0200 parsers.c: avoid implicit conversion loses integer warnings
André Sintzoff <andre.sintzoff@gmail.com> [Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:06:23 +0200] rev 24499
parsers.c: avoid implicit conversion loses integer warnings These warnings are raised by Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.57) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) and were introduced in 539b3c7eea44
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 00:20:56 -0400 test-annotate: conditionalize error output for Windows
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 29 Mar 2015 00:20:56 -0400] rev 24498
test-annotate: conditionalize error output for Windows It seems better to leave the actual output in place instead of globbing everything but 'abort:', in case it starts aborting for other reasons. It isn't clear the purpose for reversing the file name position, but that originates in windows.posixfile.
Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:57:16 -0400 test-diffstat: add a glob the test runner wants on Windows
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:57:16 -0400] rev 24497
test-diffstat: add a glob the test runner wants on Windows The test gets a '~' status without it.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip