Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:43 +0900 templater: make strings in template expressions be "string-escape"-ed correctly stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:43 +0900] rev 20663
templater: make strings in template expressions be "string-escape"-ed correctly Changeset 64b4f0cd7336 (released with 2.8.1) fixed "recursively evaluate string literals as templates" problem (issue4102) by moving the location of "string-escape"-ing from "tokenizer()" to "compiletemplate()". But some parts in template expressions below are not processed by "compiletemplate()", and it may cause unexpected result. - 'expr' of 'if(expr, then, else)' - 'expr's of 'ifeq(expr, expr, then, else)' - 'sep' of 'join(list, sep)' - 'text' and 'style' of 'rstdoc(text, style)' - 'text' and 'chars' of 'strip(text, chars)' - 'pat' and 'repl' of 'sub(pat, repl, expr)' For example, '\n' of "{join(extras, '\n')}" is not "string-escape"-ed and treated as a literal '\n'. This breaks "Display the contents of the 'extra' field, one per line" example in "hg help templates". Just "string-escape"-ing on each parts above may not work correctly, because inside expression of nested ones already applies "string-escape" on string literals. For example: - "{join(files, '\n')}" doesn't return "string-escape"-ed string, but - "{join(files, if(branch, '\n', '\n'))}" does To fix this problem, this patch does: - introduce "rawstring" token and "runrawstring" method to handle strings not to be "string-escape"-ed correctly, and - make "runstring" method return "string-escape"-ed string, and delay "string-escape"-ing until evaluation This patch invokes "compiletemplate()" with "strtoken=exp[0]" in "gettemplate()", because "exp[1]" is not yet evaluated. This code path is tested via mapping ("expr % '{template}'"). In the other hand, this patch invokes it with "strtoken='rawstring'" in "_evalifliteral()", because "t" is the result of "arg" evaluation and it should be "string-escape"-ed if "arg" is "string" expression. This patch doesn't test "string-escape"-ing on 'expr' of 'if(expr, then, else)', because it doesn't affect the result.
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:43 +0900 templater: apply "stringify()" on sub expression to get string correctly stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:43 +0900] rev 20662
templater: apply "stringify()" on sub expression to get string correctly Templating syntax allows nested expression to be specified as parts below, but they are evaluated as a generator and don't work correctly. - 'sep' of 'join(list, sep)' - 'text' and 'chars' of 'strip(text, chars)' In the former case, 'sep' returns expected string only for the first separation, and empty one for the second or later, because the generator has only one element. In the latter case, templating is aborted by exception, because the generator doesn't have 'strip()' method (as 'text') and can't be passed as the argument to 'str.strip()' (as 'chars'). This patch applies "stringify()" on these sub expression to get string correctly.
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:42 +0900 templater: avoid recursive evaluation of string literals completely stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:01:42 +0900] rev 20661
templater: avoid recursive evaluation of string literals completely Changeset 3d8bfe2ecf6d (released with 2.8.1) fixed "recursively evaluate string literals as templates" problem (issue4103) by introducing "_evalifliteral()". But some parts in template expressions below are still processed by the combination of "compiletemplate()" and "runtemplate()", and may cause same problem unexpectedly. - 'init' and 'hang' of 'fill(text, width, init, hang)' - 'expr' of 'sub(pat, repl, expr)' - 'label' of 'label(label, expr)' This patch processes them by "_evalifliteral()" instead of the combination of "compiletemplate()" and "runtemplate()" to avoid recursive evaluation of string literals completely.
Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:26:49 -0600 status: improve explanation of ' ' status
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:26:49 -0600] rev 20660
status: improve explanation of ' ' status a) it shows for states other than 'A' b) it only shows with --copies
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:08 -0800 revset: changed methods in spanset to return ordered sets
Lucas Moscovicz <lmoscovicz@fb.com> [Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:08 -0800] rev 20659
revset: changed methods in spanset to return ordered sets Now __sub__ and __and__ can smartly return ordered lazysets.
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:36:23 -0800 revset: added sort method to orderedlazyset
Lucas Moscovicz <lmoscovicz@fb.com> [Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:36:23 -0800] rev 20658
revset: added sort method to orderedlazyset
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:44:18 -0800 revset: added order methods to lazyset classes
Lucas Moscovicz <lmoscovicz@fb.com> [Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:44:18 -0800] rev 20657
revset: added order methods to lazyset classes This will allow revsets to ask for an ordered set when possible to be able to work lazily with it.
Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:37:28 +0100 setdiscovery: document algorithms used
Olle Lundberg <geek@nerd.sh> [Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:37:28 +0100] rev 20656
setdiscovery: document algorithms used This is taken from: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/208998 And modified slightly.
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:17:22 +0100 doc: gendoc.py creates valid output for option descriptions with newlines
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:17:22 +0100] rev 20655
doc: gendoc.py creates valid output for option descriptions with newlines gendoc.py did not handle the hanging indentation for descriptions. Work around this by joining all in one single line (same as in minirst since previous patch). This problem occurred when translations of option lines were very long. Do not bother the translators with this detail. On a long option description, the translator continued on a new line as usual. gendoc.py created invalid rst syntax like this: -o, --option Description line 1 description line 2 The new output is: -o, --option Description line 1 description line 2 The lines could theoretically become very long, but line breaking is handled when generating the final documentation.
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:32:21 +0100 minirst: create valid output when table data contains a newline
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:32:21 +0100] rev 20654
minirst: create valid output when table data contains a newline When table data contained a newline, the result of minirst.maketable did not look nice plus it was not recognised by minirst.format: == === ==== l1 1 one l2 2 2 22 l3 == === ==== This problem occurred when the description of options had a very long translation which was split by newlines. Do not bother a translator with this detail. The multiline translations for option descriptions have been fixed in baf1600adfbe in it.po, de.po and ro.po. I manually did the same as this patch does, I removed the newlines. When a newline was in the description, this created unusable help output: $ hg help somecommand hg somecommand [option]... with somecommand, you can... options: == =================== ======================================================= =================================== --longdesc VALUE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -n --norm normal desc --newline VALUE line1 line2 == =================== =============== =========================================================================== now this looks much nicer: ... options: --longdesc VALUE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -n --norm normal desc --newline VALUE line1 line2
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip