Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:37:38 -0400 largefiles: restore caching of largefiles with 'clone -U --all-largefiles' stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:37:38 -0400] rev 17599
largefiles: restore caching of largefiles with 'clone -U --all-largefiles' This was broken when restoring normal -u and -U functionality.
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:31:06 -0400 largefiles: restore normal 'clone -u' and 'clone -U' functionality stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:31:06 -0400] rev 17598
largefiles: restore normal 'clone -u' and 'clone -U' functionality Previously, tip would be checked out regardless of the -u or -U parameter. I'm not sure what the 'required for successful walkchangerevs' comment meant, but it appears to reference code which has since moved to downloadlfiles() in 7d6a660ca151. Perhaps it was to force caching when the -U parameter is given? The price of this change is that -U --all-largefiles won't cache anything. That will be fixed next. Note that X + Y in the 'X largefiles updated, n removed' and 'Y additional largefiles cached' lines do not add up to the same values in these tests, but all of the largefiles have been downloaded. The reason being that several largefiles have the same content (eb7338044 is pointed to by sub/large2, large3 and sub/large4). In the 'clone -u 1' operation, this largefile is cached to populate the working directory, even without --all-largefiles. That means the file isn't downloaded again and cached in the rev where large3 and sub/large4 both point to this file. Downloading that one file in that one rev seems to be counted twice with 'clone -u 0'. (Maybe it is also being downloaded twice?)
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:50:34 -0400 formatter: add base implementation of data method
David M. Carr <david@carrclan.us> [Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:50:34 -0400] rev 17597
formatter: add base implementation of data method Previously, nothing was done with the passed in values, which clearly wasn't the intention.
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:36:58 +0200 merge with stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:36:58 +0200] rev 17596
merge with stable
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:30:22 +0200 merge with main
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:30:22 +0200] rev 17595
merge with main
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:29:43 +0200 largefiles: fix trailing spaces in test-largefiles.t stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:29:43 +0200] rev 17594
largefiles: fix trailing spaces in test-largefiles.t With the default branch this will cause warnings from check-code.
Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:43:24 +0200 test-hybridencode: add a case for direncode
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:43:24 +0200] rev 17593
test-hybridencode: add a case for direncode
Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:58:35 +0200 store: optimize fncache._write by direncoding the contents in one go
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:58:35 +0200] rev 17592
store: optimize fncache._write by direncoding the contents in one go For a netbeans clone on Windows 7 x64: Before: $ hg perffncachewrite ! wall 0.210000 comb 0.218401 user 0.202801 sys 0.015600 (best of 47) After: $ hg perffncachewrite ! wall 0.104000 comb 0.109201 user 0.078000 sys 0.031200 (best of 95)
Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:41:02 +0200 store: move encode lambda logic into fncachestore
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:41:02 +0200] rev 17591
store: move encode lambda logic into fncachestore and define two named functions at module scope. This again also speeds up perffncacheencode a little bit.
Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:36:14 +0200 store: eliminate one level of lambda functions on _hybridencode
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:36:14 +0200] rev 17590
store: eliminate one level of lambda functions on _hybridencode
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip