Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:08:08 +0100 branchmap: update cache of 'unserved' filter on new changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:08:08 +0100] rev 18394
branchmap: update cache of 'unserved' filter on new changesets The `commitctx` and `addchangegroup` methods of repo upgrade branchcache after completion. This behavior aims to keep the branchcache in sync for read only process as hgweb. See ee317dbfb9d0 for details. Since changelog filtering is used, those calls only update the cache for unfiltered repo. One of no interest for typical read only process like hgweb. Note: By chance in basic case, `repo.unfiltered() == repo.filtered('unserved')` This changesets have the "unserved" cache updated instead. I think this is the only cache that matter for hgweb. We could imagine updating all possible branchcaches instead but: - I'm not sure it would have any benefit impact. It may even increase the odd of all cache being invalidated. - This is more complicated change. So I'm going for updating a single cache only which is already better that updating a cache nobody cares about. This changeset have a few expected impact on the testsuite are different cache are updated.
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:01:11 +0100 tests: make test-hgweb.t output stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:01:11 +0100] rev 18393
tests: make test-hgweb.t output stable Instability introduced in combination of a4d7fd7ad1f7 and e389a25e7e60.
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:52:17 +0100 hgweb: ensure _navseq yield strictly increasing numbers
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:52:17 +0100] rev 18392
hgweb: ensure _navseq yield strictly increasing numbers This is not hard and allows to drop hack in the customer code.
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:47:48 +0100 hgweb: better names for _navseq arguments
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:47:48 +0100] rev 18391
hgweb: better names for _navseq arguments The old names were misleading.
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:44:26 +0100 hgweb: drop recursivity in _navseq
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:44:26 +0100] rev 18390
hgweb: drop recursivity in _navseq This is totally not needed.
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:11:18 +0100 hgweb: move the `seq` function out of the revnavgen scope
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:11:18 +0100] rev 18389
hgweb: move the `seq` function out of the revnavgen scope There is not reason for it to be a in there. And this function could use a major reworks.
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:52:35 +0100 hgweb: simplify return value creation in for navgen
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:52:35 +0100] rev 18388
hgweb: simplify return value creation in for navgen We now have access to better syntax allowing a clearer version.
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:55:50 +0100 hgweb: do not access first changeset with a string
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:55:50 +0100] rev 18387
hgweb: do not access first changeset with a string There is not reason not to use an int
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100 refactoring: use unlinkpath with ignoremissing
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100] rev 18386
refactoring: use unlinkpath with ignoremissing
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100 docs: "deprecate" checkchanged and checkconflicts in merge-tool configuration
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100] rev 18385
docs: "deprecate" checkchanged and checkconflicts in merge-tool configuration These settings were replaced by check=changed and check=conflicts in a912f26777d3. There is no reason to announce two different ways to achieve the same. The old way should be kept but not announced.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip