match: fix _patsplit breakage with drive letters

statichttprepo: handle remote not supporting Range headers - If remote does not support Range header, 200 is answered instead of 206. The HTTPRangeHandler left these responses unchanged, so the data has to be sliced by the receiver. - httprangereader file pointer was not updated.

convert: better feedback when filtering out empty revisions Original patch by Herbert Griebel <herbertg@gmx.at>

inotify: server: use a common 'pollable' interface for server & repowatcher Mainly for documentation purposes: it easily explains the role of handle_event and handle_timeout, and why both server & repowatcher implement those methods.

inotify: process all inotify events in one batch When several inotify events happen, we don't have to process each event separately, calling everytime repowatcher.read_events() to fetch events from the underlying watcher: it is sufficient to call once read_events, to fetch all the events from the watcher.

inotify: rename handle_event to handle_pollevent to avoid confusion event here refers to poll events, and are different from events read in server.read_events for example, where those events are inotify events.

inotify: handle_event: do not use event and fd parameters. event is particularly confusing given the context (is it an inotify event? a polling event?) and is never used. Remove it. fd has very little use, and it gives the false impression that event handling depends on fd. It's wrong: the same behavior is triggered, for all events.

inotify: use a decorator instead of dispatching calls

inotify: do not defer inotify events processing Doing a part of the event processing and deferring the rest is a bad habit: it complexifies the code, and it does not respect event ordering! Moreover, there is already a timeout handling, so that inotify events are only processed when a treshold is exceeded: there is no requirement to delay anymore the events processing.

inotify: do not recurse in handle_timeout(): call it explicitely, not in scan() When in handle_timeout, scan() is called when a repertory is created/modified. But the first line of scan calls handle_timeout. This had the consequence of calling recursively handle_timeout: * several calls to read_events (but only the first one retrieves events) * every time that an event is queued for a deferred action, the next time that scan() is called, handle_timeout is called, the event queue is treated, even if all the events haven't been read/queued yet. This could lead to inconsistencies

i18n-da: typo

merge with crew

inotify: adding test for issue1556

inotify: proper fix for issue1542 (partially reverting 67e59a9886d5) issue1542 description: Unknown files (?) placed in a directory are still marked as present and unknown when the containing directory is moved out of the repository scope. Why 67e59a9886d5 was bad: * When the problem we're addressing only deals with unknown files, the fix to updatestatus applies for all statuses * The only reason to move the call schedule_work(wpath, 'd') seems to be that it allowed an updatestatus call on the deleted directory, in deleted(). But deleted() should not be called on directories in the first place. * After fixing an independant issue (1371), test-inotify-issue1542 was failing Fix: When processing a deletion of a directory, walk the tree of the unknown files and remove the entries from repowatcher. This step does not need to be added in the generic scan() routine: it is only necessary on a directory deletion.

inotify: server: refactor updatestatus() * Instead of one entry point, use two entry points, updatefile() and deletefile(), both internally calling the helper function _updatestatus * Do not rely on TypeError to detect the type of oldstatus: use isinstance * The call updatestatus(wpath, None) in deleted() was a bit particular: because no osstat and no newstatus was given, the newstatus was determined using the data stored internally. To replace this exact behavior with the new code, one would use: root, fn = self.split(wpath) d = self.dir(self.tree, root) self.filedeleted(wpath, d.get(fn)) This, however, duplicates code with _updatestatus(), which led us to an interesting question: why are we basing ourselves on repowatcher data to update the status, where everywhere else, we are comparing against dirsate? There is no reason to do this, which is why the new code is: self.filedeleted(wpath, self.repo.dirstate[wpath]) Incidentally, after this, the test for issue1371 passes again.