Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:44:38 -0700 tests: disallow using simple store repo with bundlerepo
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:44:38 -0700] rev 37346
tests: disallow using simple store repo with bundlerepo bundlerepo is... going to be difficult to port to an alternate store because it assumes revlogs for storage and essentially overlays the contents of a bundle onto a fake revlog-like primitive. It will be a good test case for our eventual new storage interface. Refactoring bundlerepo to make it work with non-revlog storage is going to be a bit of work. So for now, let's refuse to use the simple store repo when a bundlerepo is in play. A new test requirement advertising support for treating bundle files as repo instances has been added. Some tests have been made conditional on this feature. Additional tests will be annotated in subsequent commits. Having positive opt-in to repo features will be simpler in the long run because it will allow multiple storage backends to declare feature support and we won't have to annotate each test with the set of repo backends that are supported. Again, we'll probably want better integration between repo features and tests. But this is the easiest we can do at the moment. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3060
Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:31:35 -0700 tests: disable test-revlog-v2 when using simple store
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:31:35 -0700] rev 37345
tests: disable test-revlog-v2 when using simple store Because the simple store has nothing to do with revlogs. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3056
Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:16:04 -0700 tests: skip filelog damage tests when not using revlogs
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:16:04 -0700] rev 37344
tests: skip filelog damage tests when not using revlogs Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3042
Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:04:30 -0700 tests: skip some tests when using simple store
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:04:30 -0700] rev 37343
tests: skip some tests when using simple store generaldelta is a revlog implementation detail. We don't need to test it with the simple store. union repos are heavily revlog based. It should be possible to run them with alternate stores. But it's not worth the trouble at this juncture. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3040
Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:21:34 -0700 tests: conditionalize tests based on presence of custom extensions
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:21:34 -0700] rev 37342
tests: conditionalize tests based on presence of custom extensions The test harness supports injecting extensions via --extra-config-opt. However, if you do this, various tests that print state about loaded extensions fail. This commit teaches the test harness to recognize when custom extensions are loaded so that tests can use feature sniffing to conditionalize tests based on that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3039
Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:16:50 -0700 simplestorerepo: avoid shadowing dict in list comprehension over dict
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:16:50 -0700] rev 37341
simplestorerepo: avoid shadowing dict in list comprehension over dict Caught by pyflakes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3077
Tue, 03 Apr 2018 09:54:20 -0700 narrow: pass node into revlog.revision()
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 03 Apr 2018 09:54:20 -0700] rev 37340
narrow: pass node into revlog.revision() This is one of the few (possibly only) places where we pass an int in for filelogs. Other revlogs (notably changelog) are very heavy on int usage. But filelogs are surprisingly node centric. I'd like to formalize the interface around the use of nodes (at least for filelogs). So let's switch to a node. We can't inline revlog.node() because of a check-code rule. I think that rule is suspect. But it may be for performance reasons with changelog code. I'd rather not touch it at this time. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3043
Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:15:21 -0700 changegroup: remove "revlog" from error message
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:15:21 -0700] rev 37339
changegroup: remove "revlog" from error message The previous message leaked an implementation detail. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3041
Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:15:24 -0700 tests: conditionalize tests based on presence of revlogs for files
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:15:24 -0700] rev 37338
tests: conditionalize tests based on presence of revlogs for files ~85 tests don't like our non-revlog file store for various reasons. This commit introduces hghave functionality for declaring and querying repository features. By default, we assume repositories have revlog-based file storage. But if the HGREPOFEATURES environment variable is set, we can override the default set of repository features. If you run the test harness with our simplestorerepo extension and an environment variable set to the proper value, you can override the hghave defaults to agree with simplestorerepo's version of reality. Various tests have been modified so behavior dependent on revlog-based file storage is marked as such. This fixes a handful of test failures with our custom file storage extension. But dozens remain. The point of this commit is to demonstrate how tests will need to be modified to account for custom storage implementations. TBH, I'm not convinced hghave is the proper layer for repository feature detection. I /think/ we'll eventually want something in run-tests.py itself. But that would require inventing a new primitive in the test harness. This is all very alpha at the moment. So I think hghave is an acceptable place to hang this feature detection. I think the right time to be thinking about integrating this into run-tests.py is *after* we have a stable alternate storage implementation in core. For now, let's try to make progress towards the idea of an alternate storage backend. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3030
Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:37:07 -0700 tests: add test extension implementing custom filelog storage
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:37:07 -0700] rev 37337
tests: add test extension implementing custom filelog storage In order to better support partial clones, we'll need alternate repository storage mechanisms that aren't based on revlogs. Today, the interface for repository storage isn't very well defined. And there are various layering violations and assumptions made throughout the code that storage is backed by revlogs. In order to support alternate storage mechanisms, we'll need to formally declare and adhere to interfaces for storage. This will be a long, arduous process. This commit creates an extension that implements non-revlog storage for files. It defines a custom type that quacks like the existing revlog/filelog API but isn't backed by a revlog. The backing storage is - for simplicity reasons - a CBOR index and per-node files representing fulltext data. The localrepository class is modified so file(f) returns instances of this class instead of filelog instances. The purpose of this extension is to tease out what the actual filelog interface is - based on running the test harness - so we can formalize that interface and then implement a *real* alternate storage backend. Using `run-tests.py --extra-config-opt` to run the test harness with this extension enabled yields 83 failures out of 634 ran tests. The most common test failures are due to: * Issues with `hg verify` * LFS and largefiles (probably flags processing related) * Narrow. * Any test touching or inspecting individual filelog paths. * help and error output that is confused by the presence of an extension. * `hg debug*` commands doing low-level, revlog-y things. An 88% pass rate is pretty good for an initial implementation if you ask me! There is a bit of duplicate code in the new extension. That's by design: a point of this code is to tease out dependencies on revlog. That being said, there is opportunity to consolidate code by moving things out of the revlog API. For example, DAG traversal operations don't necessarily need to be implemented at the storage level. (Although for performance reasons they probably do.) Once we have a more well-defined interface, we could probably define the default implementations in terms of the base interface, pull those in via class inheritance, and have implementations override with faster versions if they so choose. (Or something like that.) But for now, the duplicate code should be acceptable. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3029
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip