patchbomb: use cmdutil.check_at_most_one_arg() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7637

export: use cmdutil.check_at_most_one_arg() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7636

amend: use cmdutil.check_at_most_one_arg() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7635

commit: use cmdutil.check_at_most_one_arg() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7634

clone: extract helper for checking mutually exclusive args We have some duplicated code for aborting if the user provided mutually exclusive arguments. Extensions surely have more such code. We also have duplicated translations and inconsistent output in this area. This patch introduces a simpler helper for checking if more than one option among a given set was given on the command line. I've made the clone code call the function to show that it works. The function has no good way of checking arguments with hyphens in them. I'll add that later if necessary. The function still won't be applicable in all cases, but I think it's still better than nothing. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7633

dirstate: when calling rebuild(), avoid some N^2 codepaths I had a user repo with 200k files in it. Calling `hg debugrebuilddirstate` took tens of minutes (I didn't wait for it). In that situation, changedfiles==allfiles, and both are lists. This meant that we had to run an average of 100k comparisons, for each of 200k files, just to check whether a file needed to have normallookup called (it always did), or drop. While it's probably not a huge issue, in my very awkward synthetic benchmark I wrote (not using a benchmark library or anything), I was seeing some slowdowns for small-changedfiles and very-large-allfiles invocations, with an inflection somewhere around 10 items in changedfiles (regardless of the size of allfiles); above 10 items in changedfiles, the new code appears to always be faster. For the case of 50k files in changedfiles and the same items in allfiles, I'm seeing differences of 15s of just running comparisons vs. 0.003793s. I haven't bothered to run a comparison of 200k items in changedfiles and allfiles. :) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7665

rust-warnings: fix warnings in tests It turns out that I also missed those warnings inside tests. This should be the last of them. One day we will get rid of this interface anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7678

relnotes: mention the merging of index and nodemap

crecord: remove toggleamend Previous commit removed its only calling site.

crecord: repurpose "a" key to toggle all selections (BC) I really don't like "a". I keep accidentally hitting it when I actually want "A", and then I'm suddenly in a state I don't want to be in. There's a big wall of text telling me that I've turned amend mode on or off (which one was I orginally in?), and this seems very useless. If I wanted to amend or not, I would have chosen that from the command-line, not change my mind after I've already started picking hunks apart. Furthermore, for most uses of the hunk selector (revert, uncommit, shelve/unshelve), this amend toggle doesn't make sense. It seems much better to repurpose this key to be a "weaker" version of "A". It toggles all selections. This is pretty harmless if hit accidentally, (can just hit "a" again to toggle everything and undo it), and has immediate visual feedback that something happened: all the x's and blank spaces get switched around. And unlike with amend, the current flipped state is also immediately visible without having to read a wall of text. I'm calling this a BC, however, because somewhere, someone out there has probably really fallen in love with the old use of "a" and will get angry that we took it away.