Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:17 +0200] rev 42987
flagprocessors: add a `sidedata` parameters to _processflagswrite
To read sidedata using flagprocessors, we need flag processors to store them. So
we pass this information to the flag processing layer.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6815
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:34 +0200] rev 42986
revlog: add a `sidedata` parameters to addrevision
If we want to eventually store sidedata we need to be able to pass them along.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6814
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:34:03 +0200] rev 42985
flagprocessors: have the read transform function return side data (API)
This makes it possible for flag processors to -read- flag data.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6813
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:13:45 +0200] rev 42984
flagprocessors: return flagdata in the main processing function
This function input and return are becoming stranger and stranger bnut I don't
have a good plan to make is saner without problematic code duplication, so it
will be this way to now.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6812
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:55:04 +0200] rev 42983
flagprocessors: return sidedata map in `_processflagsread`
Right now, flag processors does not return sidedata, by they will. So, we
prepare the caller to receive it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6811
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:41 +0200] rev 42982
revlog: use the new sidedata map return in the sidedata method
So far things, seems logical.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6810
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:54:04 +0200] rev 42981
revlog: return sidedata map from `_revisiondata`
Nothing extra any side data yet. However, it will happens in the future. So we
better prepare the callers of the `_revisiondata` to deal with it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6809
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:27 +0200] rev 42980
revlog: introduce a `sidedata` method
The method give access to extra information related to the revision. Such data
will not be part of the hash be strongly related to the revision. Having them
stored at the revlog level helps the storage consistency story and simplify
various things.
Example of data we could store there:
- copy tracing related informations
- graph structure related information (useful for discovery)
- unresolved conflict data
The full implementation will be introduced gradually in the coming changesets.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6808
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:35:08 -0700] rev 42979
update: clarify calculateupdate() call sites by specifying argument names
merge.calculateupdate() takes a lot of parameters and I get confused
all the time which is which.
See also b14fdf1fb615 (update: clarify update() call sites by
specifying argument names, 2017-02-09).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6883
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:57:16 -0400] rev 42978
bookmarks: remove changectx() method from bmstore (API)
All the callsites of this method have access to the repo, and I'd
rather not have to duplicate this across alternative bmstore
implementations. Besides, it feels like a bit of a layering violation.
.. api::
`mercurial.bookmarks.bmstore` no longer has a convenience method
for looking up changectx instances from a bookmark name. Use
`repo[repo.bookmarks[name]]` intead of
`repo.bookmarks.changectx(name)`.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6884