Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700 rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700] rev 46837
rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700 reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700] rev 46836
reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later We now filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits in `_handleskippingobsolete()`. The filtered-out commits are removed from the rebase set (`destmap` and `state`). We should therefore call `rewriteutil.precheck()` after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. This patch does that. It hasn't mattered so far because `rewriteutil.precheck()` doesn't yet check for divergence, but it will soon. This affects one test where we now fail because the user is trying to rebase an ancestor instead of failing because they tried to rebase a public commit. We have several similar tests just after, where we still fail because of the phase, so that seems fine. The difference in behavior also seems fine to me. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10258
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700 rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()`
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700] rev 46835
rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()` Once we've set `rebaseruntime.prepared = True`, `rebaseruntime.repo` starts returning the unfiltered repo. That will make my next patch break, because that patch moves the call to `rewriteutil.precheck()` after the call to `_handleskippingobsolete()`, which current happens after `prepared = True`. We therefore need to prepare by moving `prepared = True` a bit later, after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. I don't think that matters for that call. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10257
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700 rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700] rev 46834
rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier `hg rebase` treats obsolete commits differently depending what has happened to the commit: 1) Obsolete commit without non-obsolete successors: Skipped, and a note is printed ("it has no successor"). 2) Obsolete commit with a successor in the destination (ancestor of it): Skipped, and a note is printed ("already in destination"). 3) Obsolete commit with a successor in the rebase set: The commit and its descendants are skipped, and a note is printed ("not rebasing <commit> and its descendants as this would cause divergence"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. 4) Obsolete commit with a successor elsewhere: Error ("this rebase will cause divergences"), unless `allowdivergence` config set. Before this patch, we did all those checks up front, except for (3), which was checked later. The later check consisted of two parts: 1) filtering out of descendants, and 2) conditionally printing message if the `allowdivergence` config was not set. This patch makes it so we do the filtering early. A consequence of filtering out divergence-causing commits earlier is that we rebase commits in slightly different order, which has some impact on tests. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10249
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700 rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700] rev 46833
rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10248
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:05:02 -0800 rebase: calculate obsolescense-related info earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:05:02 -0800] rev 46832
rebase: calculate obsolescense-related info earlier My goal is to use `rewriteutil.precheck()` in the rebase code. Since rebase does its own handling of divergent commits (it skips them instead of erroring out), we need to have divergence-causing commits filtered out early. This patch helps prepare for that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10247
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:19:33 -0800 rebase: let _handleskippingobsolete(self) read directly from self
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:19:33 -0800] rev 46831
rebase: let _handleskippingobsolete(self) read directly from self The function already has `self` as an argument, so there's no need to pass data from `self` into it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10246
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:12:58 -0700 tests: test divergence created during interrupted rebase
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:12:58 -0700] rev 46830
tests: test divergence created during interrupted rebase If a rebase runs into conflicts and the user somehow rewrites an unrebased commit in the rebase set while the rebase is interrupted, continuing it might result in divergence. It turns out that we decide to skip the commit. That seems to make sense, but it wasn't obvious to me that that's what we should do. Either way, this patch adds a test case for the current behavior. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10256
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:13:29 -0700 tests: split up test-rebase-obsolete.t in four pieces
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:13:29 -0700] rev 46829
tests: split up test-rebase-obsolete.t in four pieces The test case took 42 seconds to run the test before this patch and 12 seconds after (wall time, of course). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10255
Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:04:58 +0100 path: error out if the `path://` reference point to an unknown path
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:04:58 +0100] rev 46828
path: error out if the `path://` reference point to an unknown path Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10265
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip