Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:06:39 -0700 unionrepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:06:39 -0700] rev 39605
unionrepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository This is basically the same thing we just did for bundlerepo except for union repositories. .. api:: ``unionrepo.unionrepository()`` is no longer usable on its own. To instantiate an instance, call ``unionrepo.instance()`` or ``unionrepo.makeunionrepository()``. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4556
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:50:07 -0700 bundlerepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:50:07 -0700] rev 39604
bundlerepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository Previously, bundlerepository inherited from localrepo.localrepository. You simply instantiated a bundlerepository and its __init__ called localrepo.localrepository.__init__. Things were simple. Unfortunately, this strategy is limiting because it assumes that the base repository is a localrepository instance. And it assumes various properties of localrepository, such as the arguments its __init__ takes. And it prevents us from changing behavior of localrepository.__init__ without also having to change derived classes. Previous and ongoing work to abstract storage revealed these limitations. This commit changes the initialization strategy of bundle repositories to dynamically create a type to represent the repository. Instead of a static type, we instantiate a new local repo instance via localrepo.instance(). We then combine its __class__ with bundlerepository to produce a new type. This ensures that no matter how localrepo.instance() decides to create a repository object, we can derive a bundle repo object from it. i.e. localrepo.instance() could return a type that isn't a localrepository and it would "just work." Well, it would "just work" if bundlerepository's custom implementations only accessed attributes in the documented repository interface. I'm pretty sure it violates the interface contract in a handful of places. But we can worry about that another day. This change gets us closer to doing more clever things around instantiating repository instances without having to worry about teaching bundlerepository about them. .. api:: ``bundlerepo.bundlerepository`` is no longer usable on its own. The class is combined with the class of the base repository it is associated with at run-time. New bundlerepository instances can be obtained by calling ``bundlerepo.instance()`` or ``bundlerepo.makebundlerepository()``. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4555
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:16:32 -0700 bundlerepo: factor out code for instantiating a bundle repository
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:16:32 -0700] rev 39603
bundlerepo: factor out code for instantiating a bundle repository This code will soon become a bit more complicated. So extract to its own function. And change both instantiators of bundlerepository to use it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4554
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:45:05 -0700 bundlerepo: pass create=True
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:45:05 -0700] rev 39602
bundlerepo: pass create=True I don't want to know how this came to be. Maybe a holdover from the days before Python had a bool type? Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4553
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:41:14 -0700 shelve: use bundlerepo.instance() to construct a repo object
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:41:14 -0700] rev 39601
shelve: use bundlerepo.instance() to construct a repo object The instance() functions are preferred over cls.__init__ for creating repo instances. It doesn't really matter now. But future commits will refactor the bundlerepository class in ways that will cause the old way to break. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4552
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 22:04:01 +0900 templatekw: add experimental {status} keyword
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 29 Jul 2018 22:04:01 +0900] rev 39600
templatekw: add experimental {status} keyword This is another example of fctx-based keywords. I think this is somewhat useful in log templates.
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:52:01 +0900 templatekw: add option to include ignored/clean/unknown files in cache
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:52:01 +0900] rev 39599
templatekw: add option to include ignored/clean/unknown files in cache They will be necessary to provide {status} of files.
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 22:07:42 +0900 templatekw: keep status tuple in cache dict and rename cache key accordingly
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 29 Jul 2018 22:07:42 +0900] rev 39598
templatekw: keep status tuple in cache dict and rename cache key accordingly There's no point to drop tail elements, which are mostly empty lists.
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:39:12 +0900 templatekw: extract function that computes and caches file status
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:39:12 +0900] rev 39597
templatekw: extract function that computes and caches file status
Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:32:51 +0900 py3: use sysstr() to convert ProgrammingError bytes with no unicode error risk
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:32:51 +0900] rev 39596
py3: use sysstr() to convert ProgrammingError bytes with no unicode error risk msg.decode('utf8') may fail if msg isn't an ASCII string, and that's possible as we sometimes embed a filename in the error message for example.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip