Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:29:03 -0500 doc: fix references to `revset.abstractsmartset`
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:29:03 -0500] rev 44075
doc: fix references to `revset.abstractsmartset` Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7873
Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:09:32 -0800 fsmonitor: properly handle str ex.msg
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:09:32 -0800] rev 44074
fsmonitor: properly handle str ex.msg ex.msg is always a str, since pywatchman uses str for exception messages. This commit removes a b'' from a string compare to avoid types mismatch and adds a coercion to bytes before stuffing the exception message on our local exception type, which uses bytes for the message elsewhere in this file. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7855
Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:12:20 -0500 verify: allow the storage to signal when renames can be tested on `skipread`
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:12:20 -0500] rev 44073
verify: allow the storage to signal when renames can be tested on `skipread` This applies the new marker in the lfs handler to show it in action, and adds the test mentioned at the beginning of the series to show that fulltext isn't necessary in the LFS case. The existing `skipread` isn't enough, because it is also set if an error occurs reading the revlog data, or the data is censored. It could probably be cleared, but then it technically violates the interface contract. That wouldn't matter for the existing verify algorithm, but it isn't clear how that will change as alternate storage support is added. The flag is probably pretty revlog specific, given the comments in verify.py. But there's already filelog specific stuff in there and I'm not sure what future storage will bring, so I don't want to over-engineer this. Likewise, I'm not sure that we want the verify method for each storage type to completely drive the bus when it comes to detecting renames, so I don't want to go down the rabbithole of having verifyintegrity() return metadata hints at this point. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7713
Sun, 22 Dec 2019 23:50:19 -0500 lfs: don't skip locally available blobs when verifying
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 22 Dec 2019 23:50:19 -0500] rev 44072
lfs: don't skip locally available blobs when verifying The `skipflags` config was introduced in a2ab9ebcd85b, which specifically calls out downloading and storing all blobs as potentially too expensive. But I don't see any reason to skip blobs that are already available locally. Hashing the blob is the only way to indirectly verify the rawdata content stored in the revlog. (The note in that commit about skipping renamed is still correct, but the reason given about needing fulltext isn't.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7712
Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:11:35 -0500 lfs: add a switch to `hg verify` to ignore the content of blobs
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:11:35 -0500] rev 44071
lfs: add a switch to `hg verify` to ignore the content of blobs Trying to validate the fulltext of an external revision causes missing blobs to be downloaded and cached. Since the downloads aren't batch prefetched[1] and aren't compressed, this can be expensive both in terms of time and space. I made this a tri-state instead of a simple bool because there's an existing (undocumented) config to handle this, and it would be weird if `hg verify` were to suddenly start ignoring that config but an `hg recover` initiated verify honors it. Since this uses the same config setting, it too will skip rename verification (which requires fulltext, but not for LFS). [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-April/116118.html Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7708
Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:37:54 -0500 revlog: run rustfmt nightly
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:37:54 -0500] rev 44070
revlog: run rustfmt nightly I'm a little nervous about folding this back (might be nightly rustfmt mismatches?) so I want someone to review this. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7813
Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:37:01 -0500 examples: specify rustfmt nightly using a $() construct
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:37:01 -0500] rev 44069
examples: specify rustfmt nightly using a $() construct This is ugly, but it's how we have to configure rustfmt for now as we require nightly rustfmt. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7812
Sat, 07 Dec 2019 13:13:48 -0800 hg-core: rustfmt path.rs
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 07 Dec 2019 13:13:48 -0800] rev 44068
hg-core: rustfmt path.rs The file as vendored does not conform to our source formatting conventions. Let's reformat it so it does. # skip-blame automated code reformatting Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7580
Sat, 07 Dec 2019 10:26:28 -0800 hg-core: vendor Facebook's path utils module
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 07 Dec 2019 10:26:28 -0800] rev 44067
hg-core: vendor Facebook's path utils module The added file was imported from https://github.com/facebookexperimental/eden/blob/d1d8fb939a39aa331ae7f162c39cbcaa511d474b/eden/scm/lib/util/src/path.rs without modifications. The file is not yet integrated into our project. This will be done in subsequent commits. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7573
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:04:12 +0100 revlog-native: introduced ABI version in capsule
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:04:12 +0100] rev 44066
revlog-native: introduced ABI version in capsule Concerns that an inconsistency could arise between the actual contents of the capsule in revlog.c and the Rust consumer have been raised after the switch to the array of data and function pointers in f384d68d8ea8. It has been suggested that the `version` from parsers.c could be use for this. In this change, we introduce instead a separate ABI version number, which should have the following advantages: - no need to change the consuming Rust code for changes that have nothing to do with the contents of the capsule - the version number in parsers.c is not explicitely flagged as ABI. It's not obvious to me whether an ABI change that would be invisible to Python would warrant an increment The drawback is that developers now have to consider two version numbers. We expect the added cost of the check to be negligible because it occurs at instantiation of `CIndex` only, which in turn is tied to instantiation of Python objects such as `LazyAncestors` and `MixedIndex`. Frequent calls to `Cindex::new` should also probably hit the CPU branch predictor. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7856
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip