Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:56:53 -0800 merge: let bid merge work on the file->action dict
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:56:53 -0800] rev 23638
merge: let bid merge work on the file->action dict By moving the conversion from the file->action dict after the bid merge code, bid merge can be simplified a little. A few tests are affected by this change. Where we used to iterate over the actions first in order of the action type ('g', 'r', etc.) [1], we now iterate in order of filename. This difference affects the order of debug log statements. [1] And then in the non-deterministic order of files in the manifest dictionary (the order returned from manifest.diff()).
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:24:10 -0800 merge: write manifestmerge() using dictionary with entry per file
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:24:10 -0800] rev 23637
merge: write manifestmerge() using dictionary with entry per file In the same vein as 38e55e55ae4d (largefiles: rewrite merge code using dictionary with entry per file, 2014-12-09), rewrite manifestmerge() itself as dictionary with the filename as key. This will let us simplify some of the other code in merge.py and eventually drop the conversion in the largefiles code. No difference in speed could be detected (well within the noise level when run in Mozilla repo).
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:21:07 -0800 repoview: backout ced3ecfc2e57
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:21:07 -0800] rev 23636
repoview: backout ced3ecfc2e57 Monkey patching repoview does not really work and making it really work will be really hard. So we better have it broken without complexity than broken with extra complexity.
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:19:33 -0800 largefile: explain why no monkey patching on a repoview
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:19:33 -0800] rev 23635
largefile: explain why no monkey patching on a repoview The comment requested for investigations, here they are.
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:10:16 -0800 largefile: backout ca54fb3d71ce
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:10:16 -0800] rev 23634
largefile: backout ca54fb3d71ce The hack for method monkey patching on repoview has been ruled out as fragile, so we are rolling it back. We'll expand the explanation in the next changeset.
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:33:17 -0800 incoming: handle phases the same as pull
Eric Sumner <ericsumner@fb.com> [Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:33:17 -0800] rev 23633
incoming: handle phases the same as pull Now that bundlerepo can move phases safely, 'hg incoming' can share its phase handling code with pull to better reflect what would actually show up.
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:22:43 -0800 bundlerepo: retract phase boundary
Eric Sumner <ericsumner@fb.com> [Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:22:43 -0800] rev 23632
bundlerepo: retract phase boundary This patch makes bundrepo retract the phase boundary for new commits to 'draft' status, which is consistent with the behavior of 'hg unbundle'. The old behavior was for commits to appear with the same phase as their nearest ancestor in the base repository. This affects several classes of operation: * Inspecting a bundle with the -B flag * Treating a bundle file as a peer (old: everything public, new: everything draft) * Incoming command (neither old or new behavior is sensible -- fixed in next patch)
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:38:48 -0800 bundlerepo: implement safe phasecache
Eric Sumner <ericsumner@fb.com> [Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:38:48 -0800] rev 23631
bundlerepo: implement safe phasecache This patch makes bundlerepo use a subclass of phasecache that will allow phase boundaries to be moved around, but will never write them to the underlying repository.
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:30:10 -0800 localrepo.__getitem__: add slicing support
Eric Sumner <ericsumner@fb.com> [Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:30:10 -0800] rev 23630
localrepo.__getitem__: add slicing support This allows the python slice syntax to be used with revision numbers when indexing into a repository, such as repo[8:]
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:34:53 -0800 ignore: resolve ignore files relative to repo root (issue4473) (BC)
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:34:53 -0800] rev 23629
ignore: resolve ignore files relative to repo root (issue4473) (BC) Previously these would be considered to be relative to the current working directory. That behavior is both undocumented and doesn't really make sense. There are two reasonable options for how to resolve relative paths: - relative to the repo root - relative to the config file Resolving these files relative to the repo root matches existing behavior with hooks. An earlier discussion about this is available at http://mercurial.markmail.org/thread/tvu7yhzsiywgkjzl. Thanks to Isaac Jurado <diptongo@gmail.com> for the initial patchset that spurred the discussion.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip