Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:22:11 -0800 forget: use relative paths for --interactive
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:22:11 -0800] rev 41661
forget: use relative paths for --interactive Seems more consistent. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5912
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:20:46 -0800 automv: respect ui.relative-paths
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:20:46 -0800] rev 41660
automv: respect ui.relative-paths Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5910
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:27:54 -0800 debugwalk: avoid match.rel() and use repo.pathto() instead
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:27:54 -0800] rev 41659
debugwalk: avoid match.rel() and use repo.pathto() instead I'm about to delete match.rel() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5909
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:27:26 -0800 match: delete unused abs() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:27:26 -0800] rev 41658
match: delete unused abs() (API) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5908
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:00:05 -0800 copy: respect ui.relative-paths in copy/rename
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:00:05 -0800] rev 41657
copy: respect ui.relative-paths in copy/rename Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5907
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 12:00:44 -0800 match: delete unused uipath() and _uipathrelative (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 12:00:44 -0800] rev 41656
match: delete unused uipath() and _uipathrelative (API) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5906
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 11:56:39 -0800 diff: respect ui.relative-paths for warning about path outside --root
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 11:56:39 -0800] rev 41655
diff: respect ui.relative-paths for warning about path outside --root I set legacyrelativevalue=True rather than being based on what patterns the user passed (as the current match.uipath() does). I think it simply doesn't really matter for this message (there are not even any tests for it). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5905
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:29:14 -0800 largefiles: use uipathfn instead of match.{rel,uipath}() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:29:14 -0800] rev 41654
largefiles: use uipathfn instead of match.{rel,uipath}() (API) All callers now pass in a uipathfn, so we can just use that instead of choosing the right match function. This also means that when we make add/remove respect ui.relative-paths, it will work for largefiles too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5904
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:08:01 -0800 forget: pass around uipathfn and use instead of m.rel() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:08:01 -0800] rev 41653
forget: pass around uipathfn and use instead of m.rel() (API) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5911
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:25:39 -0800 addremove: pass around uipathfn and use instead of m.uipath() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:25:39 -0800] rev 41652
addremove: pass around uipathfn and use instead of m.uipath() (API) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5903
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip