Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:35:17 -0700 contrib: rename clang-format-blacklist to clang-format-ignorelist
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:35:17 -0700] rev 37184
contrib: rename clang-format-blacklist to clang-format-ignorelist "blacklist" is racially charged. Let's rename it to something that isn't. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2974
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 14:08:44 -0800 fix: new extension for automatically modifying file contents
Danny Hooper <hooper@google.com> [Sat, 03 Mar 2018 14:08:44 -0800] rev 37183
fix: new extension for automatically modifying file contents This change implements most of the corresponding proposal as discussed at the 4.4 and 4.6 sprints: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/AutomaticFormattingPlan This change notably does not include parallel execution of the formatter/fixer tools. It does allow for implementing that without affecting other areas of the code. I believe the test coverage to be good, but this is a hotbed of corner cases. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2897
Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:11:42 -0700 tests: ignore zope packages when running pyflakes
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:11:42 -0700] rev 37182
tests: ignore zope packages when running pyflakes Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2972
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:48:36 -0700 repository: define interface for local repositories
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:48:36 -0700] rev 37181
repository: define interface for local repositories Per discussions on the mailing list and at the 4.4 and 4.6 sprints, we want to start defining interfaces for local repository primitives so that we a) have a better idea of what the formal interface for various types is b) can more easily introduce alternate implementations of various components (e.g. in Rust). We have previously implemented interfaces that declare the peer and wire protocol APIs using the abc module. This commit introduces a monolithic interface for the localrepository class. It uses zope.interface - not abc - for defining and declaring the interface. The newly defined "completelocalrepository" interface is objectively horrible. It is based on what is actually in localrepository and doesn't represent a reasonable interface definition IMO. There's lots of... unwanted garbage in the interface. In other words, it reflects the horrible state of the localrepository "god object." But this is fine: a goal of this commit is to get the interface defined so that we have an interface. Future commits can refactor the interface into sub-interfaces, remove unwanted public attributes, etc. I attempted to define reasonable docstrings for the various interface members. But there are so many of them and I didn't know what some are used for. So I was lazy in a number of places and didn't write docstrings or detailed usage docs. Also, the members of the interface are defined in the order they are declared in localrepo.py. This revealed that the grouping of things in localrepo.py is... odd. The localrepository class now declares that it implements our newly defined interface. Unlike abc, zope.interface doesn't check interface conformance at type creation time (abc uses __metaclass__ magic to validate interface conformance when a type is created - usually at module import time). It does provide some functions for validating class and object conformance with declared interfaces. We add these checks to test-check-interfaces.py. We /could/ validate at run-time. But we hold off for now. (I'm a bit scared of doing that because of the various ways extensions monkeypatch repo instances.) After this commit, test-check-interfaces.py will fail if the set of public attributes on the localrepository class or instances change without corresponding updates to the interface. This is by design. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2933
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:32:47 -0700 setup: register zope.interface packages and compile C extension
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:32:47 -0700] rev 37180
setup: register zope.interface packages and compile C extension With this change, we should be able to use zope.interface in core! Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2932
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:13:40 -0700 thirdparty: allow zope.interface.advice to be lazily imported
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:13:40 -0700] rev 37179
thirdparty: allow zope.interface.advice to be lazily imported The symbol from this module is only used in functions. Let's access that symbol through its imported module so importing zope.interface.advice can be lazy. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2931
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:52:30 -0700 thirdparty: port zope.interface to relative imports
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:52:30 -0700] rev 37178
thirdparty: port zope.interface to relative imports By using relative imports, we're guaranteed to get modules vendored with Mercurial rather than other random modules that might be in sys.path. My editor strips trailing whitespace on save. So some minor source code cleanup was also performed as part of this commit. # no-check-commit because some modified lines have double newlines Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2930
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:49:07 -0700 thirdparty: don't make zope a namespace package
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:49:07 -0700] rev 37177
thirdparty: don't make zope a namespace package There are a gazillion zope.* packages in the wild. So zope/__init__.py needs to be a namespace package. But in Mercurial, we have 1 zope package. And even if we had multiple packages, they'd all be in thirdparty/zope/. So we don't need a namespace package. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2929
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:48:50 -0700 thirdparty: vendor zope.interface 4.4.3
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:48:50 -0700] rev 37176
thirdparty: vendor zope.interface 4.4.3 I've been trying to formalize interfaces for various components of Mercurial. So far, we've been using the "abc" package. This package is "good enough" for a lot of tasks. But it quickly falls over. For example, if you declare an @abc.abstractproperty, you must implement that attribute with a @property or the class compile time checking performed by abc will complain. This often forces you to implement dumb @property wrappers to return a _ prefixed attribute of the sane name. That's ugly. I've also wanted to implement automated checking that classes conform to various interfaces and don't expose other "public" attributes. After doing a bit of research and asking around, the general consensus seems to be that zope.interface is the best package for doing interface-based programming in Python. It has built-in support for verifying classes and objects conform to interfaces. It allows an interface's properties to be defined during __init__. There's even an "adapter registry" that allow you to register interfaces and look up which classes implement them. That could potentially be useful for places where our custom registry.py modules currently facilitates central registrations, but at a type level. Imagine extensions providing alternate implementations of things like the local repository interface to allow opening repositories with custom requirements. Anyway, this commit vendors zope.interface 4.4.3. The contents of the source tarball have been copied into mercurial/thirdparty/zope/ without modifications. Test modules have been removed because they are not interesting to us. The LICENSE.txt file has been copied so it lives next to the source. The Python modules don't use relative imports. zope/__init__.py defines a namespace package. So we'll need to modify the source code before this package is usable inside Mercurial. This will be done in subsequent commits. # no-check-commit for various style failures Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2928
Thu, 29 Mar 2018 23:05:41 -0700 context: set repo property in basectx
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 29 Mar 2018 23:05:41 -0700] rev 37175
context: set repo property in basectx It seems like a good practice to call the super constructor. Let's start by passing the repo along to basectx so it can assign it to a private attribute. We should perhaps pass the rev and node along as well, but that requires more work before it can be done. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2970
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip