hghave: add some official category for known-bad and missing-good output
This will make it simple to tag output that are expected to changes. A simple
hghave integration seems enough but smarter behavior around these seems possible
in the future.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9607
[('string', 'string value'), ('bool1', 'true'), ('bool2', 'false'), ('boolinvalid', 'foo'), ('int1', '42'), ('int2', '-42'), ('intinvalid', 'foo')]
[('list1', 'foo'), ('list2', 'foo bar baz'), ('list3', 'alice, bob'), ('list4', 'foo bar baz alice, bob'), ('list5', 'abc d"ef"g "hij def"'), ('list6', '"hello world", "how are you?"'), ('list7', 'Do"Not"Separate'), ('list8', '"Do"Separate'), ('list9', '"Do\\"NotSeparate"'), ('list10', 'string "with extraneous" quotation mark"'), ('list11', 'x, y'), ('list12', '"x", "y"'), ('list13', '""" key = "x", "y" """'), ('list14', ',,,,'), ('list15', '" just with starting quotation'), ('list16', '"longer quotation" with "no ending quotation'), ('list17', 'this is \\" "not a quotation mark"'), ('list18', 'ding\ndong')]
---
'string value'
'true'
'false'
None
---
'values.string is not a boolean (\'string value\')'
True
False
False
False
True
---
42
-42
---
['foo']
['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
['alice', 'bob']
['foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'alice', 'bob']
['foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'alice', 'bob']
['abc', 'd"ef"g', 'hij def']
['hello world', 'how are you?']
['Do"Not"Separate']
['Do', 'Separate']
['Do"NotSeparate']
['string', 'with extraneous', 'quotation', 'mark"']
['x', 'y']
['x', 'y']
['', ' key = ', 'x"', 'y', '', '"']
[]
['"', 'just', 'with', 'starting', 'quotation']
['longer quotation', 'with', '"no', 'ending', 'quotation']
['this', 'is', '"', 'not a quotation mark']
['ding', 'dong']
[]
[]
['foo']
['foo']
['foo', 'bar']
['foo', 'bar']
['foo bar']
['foo', 'bar']
---
(0, 0)
(1113868800, 0)
None
True
boolinvalid
intinvalid
dateinvalid