revert: do not requires '--all' if '--interative' is present
The '--all' option have been introduced in 890e285c52a1 (August 2006), most
probably to prevent user shooting themselves in the foot. As the record process
will let you, view and select the set of files and change you want to revert, I
feel like the '--all' flag is superfluous in the '--interactive' case.
Revert interactive tests
1 add and commit file f
2 add commit file folder1/g
3 add and commit file folder2/h
4 add and commit file folder1/i
5 commit change to file f
6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and
9 make workdir match 7
10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations
$ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
> [ui]
> interactive = true
> [extensions]
> record =
> EOF
$ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2
$ cd a
$ hg init
>>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n")
$ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f"
$ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g"
$ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h"
$ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i"
>>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying f"
>>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g"
>>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h"
$ hg tip
changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: modifying folder2/h
$ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
> y
> y
> y
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
reverting f
reverting folder1/g (glob)
removing folder1/i (glob)
reverting folder2/h (glob)
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-b
record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-c
1
2
3
4
5
record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-d
record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ cat f
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat folder1/g
1
2
3
4
5
d
$ cat folder2/h
e
1
2
3
4
5
f
Test that --interactive lift the need for --all
$ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2
reverting folder1/g (glob)
reverting folder2/h (glob)
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
1 hunks, 1 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q
abort: user quit
[255]
$ rm folder1/g.orig
$ hg update -C 6
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
> y
> y
> y
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
reverting f
reverting folder1/g (glob)
removing folder1/i (glob)
reverting folder2/h (glob)
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-b
record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-c
1
2
3
4
5
record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-d
record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ cat f
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat folder1/g
1
2
3
4
5
d
$ cat folder2/h
e
1
2
3
4
5
f
$ hg st
M f
M folder1/g
R folder1/i
$ hg revert --interactive f << EOF
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
diff -r 59dd6e4ab63a f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
1
2
3
4
5
+b
record change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ hg st
M f
M folder1/g
R folder1/i
? f.orig
$ cat f
a
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat f.orig
1
2
3
4
5