mercurial/py3kcompat.py
author Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com>
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:29:21 +0100
changeset 13158 9e7e24052745
parent 11878 8bb1481cf08f
child 17424 e7cfe3587ea4
permissions -rw-r--r--
merge: fast-forward merge with descendant issue2538 gives a case where a changeset is merged with its child (which is on another branch), and to my surprise the result is a real merge with two parents, not just a "fast forward" "merge" with only the child as parent. That is essentially the same as issue619. Is the existing behaviour as intended and correct? Or is the following fix correct? Some extra "created new head" pops up with this fix, but it seems to me like they could be considered correct. The old branch head has been superseeded by changes on the other branch, and when the changes on the other branch is merged back to the branch it will introduce a new head not directly related to the previous branch head. (I guess the intention with existing behaviour could be to ensure that the changesets on the branch are directly connected and that no new heads pops up on merges.)

# py3kcompat.py - compatibility definitions for running hg in py3k
#
# Copyright 2010 Renato Cunha <renatoc@gmail.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

import os, builtins

from numbers import Number

def bytesformatter(format, args):
    '''Custom implementation of a formatter for bytestrings.

    This function currently relias on the string formatter to do the
    formatting and always returns bytes objects.

    >>> bytesformatter(20, 10)
    0
    >>> bytesformatter('unicode %s, %s!', ('string', 'foo'))
    b'unicode string, foo!'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %d: %s', (1, b'result'))
    b'test 1: result'
    '''
    # The current implementation just converts from bytes to unicode, do
    # what's needed and then convert the results back to bytes.
    # Another alternative is to use the Python C API implementation.
    if isinstance(format, Number):
        # If the fixer erroneously passes a number remainder operation to
        # bytesformatter, we just return the correct operation
        return format % args
    if isinstance(format, bytes):
        format = format.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, bytes):
        args = args.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, tuple):
        newargs = []
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, bytes):
                arg = arg.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
            newargs.append(arg)
        args = tuple(newargs)
    ret = format % args
    return ret.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
builtins.bytesformatter = bytesformatter

# Create bytes equivalents for os.environ values
for key in list(os.environ.keys()):
    # UTF-8 is fine for us
    bkey = key.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    bvalue = os.environ[key].encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    os.environ[bkey] = bvalue

origord = builtins.ord
def fakeord(char):
    if isinstance(char, int):
        return char
    return origord(char)
builtins.ord = fakeord

if __name__ == '__main__':
    import doctest
    doctest.testmod()