tests/test-status-eacces.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Thu, 04 Apr 2024 16:41:43 +0200
branchstable
changeset 51561 7752cf4f64cc
parent 50323 86d2a28c018e
permissions -rw-r--r--
bundle-spec: properly identify changegroup-less bundle It is possible to produce a bundle without changegroup. For example if we want to only send phases or obsolescence information. However that lead to crash for command that identifies bundle content. So we fix that. The test will come in the next changesets, when we fix another bug preventing to generate such bundle by hand.

#testcases dirstate-v1 dirstate-v2

#if dirstate-v2
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
  > [format]
  > use-dirstate-v2=1
  > [storage]
  > dirstate-v2.slow-path=allow
  > EOF
#endif


The proliferation of status implementations can be confusing:
- The pure python implementation:
(no-rhg pure !)
- The C implementation:
(no-rhg no-rust no-pure !)
- The two rust implementations:
(rhg !)
(no-rhg rust !)

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ mkdir d1
  $ touch d1/x
  $ hg commit -Am.
  adding d1/x
  $ touch d1/y
  $ chmod -r d1
  $ hg status
  d1: $EACCES$
  ! d1/x (rhg !)
  ! d1/x (no-rhg rust !)
  $ hg status
  d1: $EACCES$
  ! d1/x (rust !)
  ! d1/x (no-rust rhg !)
  $ chmod +r d1
  $ hg status
  ? d1/y

  $ touch d1/z
  $ hg status
  ? d1/y
  ? d1/z