match: strengthen visit_children_set invariant, Recursive means "all files"
My previous interpretation of "Recursive" was too relaxed: I thought it
instructed the caller to do something like this:
> you can stop calling `visit_children_set` because you'll need to descend into
> every directory recursively, but you should still check every file if it
> matches or not
Whereas the real instruction seems to be:
> I guarantee that everything in this subtree matches, you can stop
> querying the matcher for all files and dirs altogether.
The evidence to support this:
- the test actually passes with the stronger invariant, revealing no
exceptions from this rule
- the implementation of `visit_children_set` for `DifferenceMatcher`
clearly relies on this requirement, so it must hold for that not to
lead to bugs.
copyright (c) 2006-2010 David JEAN LOUIS
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.