revert: evaluate filesets against working directory (issue4497)
As the failing revert tests in test-fileset-generated.t show,
Revert currently creates one matcher for matching files in the working
copy and another matcher for matching files in the target
revision. The two matchers are created with different contexts, which
means filesets are evaluated differently. Then the union of the sets
of files matching the matchers in the two contexts are reverted. It
doesn't seem to make sense to use two different matchers; only the
context they're applied to should be different.
It seems very likely that the user wants the filesets to be evaluated
against the working directory, which the tests
test-fileset-generated.t also assume, so let's make it so.
I willingly admit that the largefiles code was modified by trial and
error (according to tests).
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
> import sys
> print 'Using custom patch'
> if '--binary' in sys.argv:
> print '--binary found !'
> EOF
$ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a > a
$ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
$ cd ..
This test checks that:
- custom patch commands with arguments actually work
- patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
--binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
--binary is added by default under win32.
check custom patch options are honored
$ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
$ hg clone -r 0 a b
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
applying ../a.diff
Using custom patch
applied to working directory
Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description
Prepare source repo and patch:
$ rm $HGRCPATH
$ hg init c
$ cd c
$ printf "a\rc" > a
$ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
$ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
$ cat << eof > log
> first line which can't start with '# '
> # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
> A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
> eof
$ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
$ hg export -o p 1
$ cd ..
Clone and apply patch:
$ hg clone -r 0 c d
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd d
$ hg import ../c/p
applying ../c/p
$ hg log -v -r 1
changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: a
description:
first line which can't start with '# '
# second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
# HG changeset patch
# User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
$ cd ..