tests/test-double-merge.t
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:04:51 -0700
changeset 24438 5b85a5bc5bbb
parent 21391 cb15835456cb
child 25125 bd625cd4e5e7
permissions -rw-r--r--
revert: evaluate filesets against working directory (issue4497) As the failing revert tests in test-fileset-generated.t show, Revert currently creates one matcher for matching files in the working copy and another matcher for matching files in the target revision. The two matchers are created with different contexts, which means filesets are evaluated differently. Then the union of the sets of files matching the matchers in the two contexts are reverted. It doesn't seem to make sense to use two different matchers; only the context they're applied to should be different. It seems very likely that the user wants the filesets to be evaluated against the working directory, which the tests test-fileset-generated.t also assume, so let's make it so. I willingly admit that the largefiles code was modified by trial and error (according to tests).

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m
  updating: bar 1/2 files (50.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m
  updating: foo 2/2 files (100.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for foo (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..