exchange: refactor APIs to obtain bundle data (API)
Currently, exchange.getbundle() returns either a cg1unpacker or a
util.chunkbuffer (in the case of bundle2). This is kinda OK, as
both expose a .read() to consumers. However, localpeer.getbundle()
has code inferring what the response type is based on arguments and
converts the util.chunkbuffer returned in the bundle2 case to a
bundle2.unbundle20 instance. This is a sign that the API for
exchange.getbundle() is not ideal because it doesn't consistently
return an "unbundler" instance.
In addition, unbundlers mask the fact that there is an underlying
generator of changegroup data. In both cg1 and bundle2, this generator
is being fed into a util.chunkbuffer so it can be re-exposed as a
file object.
util.chunkbuffer is a nice abstraction. However, it should only be
used "at the edges." This is because keeping data as a generator is
more efficient than converting it to a chunkbuffer, especially if we
convert that chunkbuffer back to a generator (as is the case in some
code paths currently).
This patch refactors exchange.getbundle() into
exchange.getbundlechunks(). The new API returns an iterator of chunks
instead of a file-like object.
Callers of exchange.getbundle() have been updated to use the new API.
There is a minor change of behavior in test-getbundle.t. This is
because `hg debuggetbundle` isn't defining bundlecaps. As a result,
a cg1 data stream and unpacker is being produced. This is getting fed
into a new bundle20 instance via bundle2.writebundle(), which uses
a backchannel mechanism between changegroup generation to add the
"nbchanges" part parameter. I never liked this backchannel mechanism
and I plan to remove it someday. `hg bundle` still produces the
"nbchanges" part parameter, so there should be no user-visible
change of behavior. I consider this "regression" a bug in
`hg debuggetbundle`. And that bug is captured by an existing
"TODO" in the code to use bundle2 capabilities.
$ hg init
$ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo foo > a
$ echo foo > a2
$ hg add a a2
$ hg ci -m "start"
$ hg mv a b
$ hg mv a2 b2
$ hg ci -m "rename"
$ hg co 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo blahblah > a
$ echo blahblah > a2
$ hg mv a2 c2
$ hg ci -m "modify"
created new head
$ hg merge -y --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
c2
unmatched files in other:
b
b2
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
c2
b2
preserving a for resolve of b
removing a
b2: remote created -> g
getting b2
b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
merging a and b to b
my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
premerge successful
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -AC
M b
a
M b2
R a
C c2
$ cat b
blahblah
$ hg ci -m "merge"
$ hg debugindex b
rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re)
0 0 67 ..... 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
1 67 72 ..... 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f (re)
$ hg debugrename b
b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66
This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg cp b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
$ hg up eb92d88a9712
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm b3 b4
$ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'
We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg mv b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
$ hg up c761c6948de0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Check for issue2642
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1 # backport
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ hg ci -qm3
$ hg merge 2
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c0
$ cd ..
Check for issue2089
$ hg init repo2089
$ cd repo2089
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ echo c2 > f1
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 1 -q
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -Aqm3
$ hg up 2 -q
$ hg merge 3
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c2
$ cd ..
Check for issue3074
$ hg init repo3074
$ cd repo3074
$ echo foo > file
$ hg add file
$ hg commit -m "added file"
$ hg mv file newfile
$ hg commit -m "renamed file"
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm file
$ hg commit -m "deleted file"
created new head
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
newfile
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
newfile
newfile: remote created -> g
getting newfile
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status
M newfile
$ cd ..