exchange: refactor APIs to obtain bundle data (API)
Currently, exchange.getbundle() returns either a cg1unpacker or a
util.chunkbuffer (in the case of bundle2). This is kinda OK, as
both expose a .read() to consumers. However, localpeer.getbundle()
has code inferring what the response type is based on arguments and
converts the util.chunkbuffer returned in the bundle2 case to a
bundle2.unbundle20 instance. This is a sign that the API for
exchange.getbundle() is not ideal because it doesn't consistently
return an "unbundler" instance.
In addition, unbundlers mask the fact that there is an underlying
generator of changegroup data. In both cg1 and bundle2, this generator
is being fed into a util.chunkbuffer so it can be re-exposed as a
file object.
util.chunkbuffer is a nice abstraction. However, it should only be
used "at the edges." This is because keeping data as a generator is
more efficient than converting it to a chunkbuffer, especially if we
convert that chunkbuffer back to a generator (as is the case in some
code paths currently).
This patch refactors exchange.getbundle() into
exchange.getbundlechunks(). The new API returns an iterator of chunks
instead of a file-like object.
Callers of exchange.getbundle() have been updated to use the new API.
There is a minor change of behavior in test-getbundle.t. This is
because `hg debuggetbundle` isn't defining bundlecaps. As a result,
a cg1 data stream and unpacker is being produced. This is getting fed
into a new bundle20 instance via bundle2.writebundle(), which uses
a backchannel mechanism between changegroup generation to add the
"nbchanges" part parameter. I never liked this backchannel mechanism
and I plan to remove it someday. `hg bundle` still produces the
"nbchanges" part parameter, so there should be no user-visible
change of behavior. I consider this "regression" a bug in
`hg debuggetbundle`. And that bug is captured by an existing
"TODO" in the code to use bundle2 capabilities.
#require bzr
$ . "$TESTDIR/bzr-definitions"
empty directory
$ mkdir test-empty
$ cd test-empty
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ echo content > a
$ bzr add -q a
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Initial add'
$ mkdir empty
$ bzr add -q empty
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Empty directory added'
$ echo content > empty/something
$ bzr add -q empty/something
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Added file into directory'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
2 Initial add
1 Empty directory added
0 Added file into directory
$ manifest source-hg 1
% manifest of 1
644 a
$ manifest source-hg tip
% manifest of tip
644 a
644 empty/something
$ cd ..
directory renames
$ mkdir test-dir-rename
$ cd test-dir-rename
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ mkdir tpyo
$ echo content > tpyo/something
$ bzr add -q tpyo
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Added directory'
$ bzr mv tpyo typo
tpyo => typo
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Oops, typo'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
1 Added directory
0 Oops, typo
$ manifest source-hg 0
% manifest of 0
644 tpyo/something
$ manifest source-hg tip
% manifest of tip
644 typo/something
$ cd ..
nested directory renames
$ mkdir test-nested-dir-rename
$ cd test-nested-dir-rename
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ mkdir -p firstlevel/secondlevel/thirdlevel
$ echo content > firstlevel/secondlevel/file
$ echo this_needs_to_be_there_too > firstlevel/secondlevel/thirdlevel/stuff
$ bzr add -q firstlevel
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Added nested directories'
$ bzr mv firstlevel/secondlevel secondlevel
firstlevel/secondlevel => secondlevel
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Moved secondlevel one level up'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
1 Added nested directories
0 Moved secondlevel one level up
$ manifest source-hg tip
% manifest of tip
644 secondlevel/file
644 secondlevel/thirdlevel/stuff
$ cd ..
directory remove
$ mkdir test-dir-remove
$ cd test-dir-remove
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ mkdir src
$ echo content > src/sourcecode
$ bzr add -q src
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Added directory'
$ bzr rm -q src
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Removed directory'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
1 Added directory
0 Removed directory
$ manifest source-hg 0
% manifest of 0
644 src/sourcecode
$ manifest source-hg tip
% manifest of tip
$ cd ..
directory replace
$ mkdir test-dir-replace
$ cd test-dir-replace
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ mkdir first second
$ echo content > first/file
$ echo morecontent > first/dummy
$ echo othercontent > second/something
$ bzr add -q first second
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Initial layout'
$ bzr mv first/file second/file
first/file => second/file
$ bzr mv first third
first => third
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Some conflicting moves'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
1 Initial layout
0 Some conflicting moves
$ manifest source-hg tip
% manifest of tip
644 second/file
644 second/something
644 third/dummy
$ cd ..
divergent nested renames (issue3089)
$ mkdir test-divergent-renames
$ cd test-divergent-renames
$ bzr init -q source
$ cd source
$ mkdir -p a/c
$ echo a > a/fa
$ echo c > a/c/fc
$ bzr add -q a
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Initial layout'
$ bzr mv a b
a => b
$ mkdir a
$ bzr add a
add(ed|ing) a (re)
$ bzr mv b/c a/c
b/c => a/c
$ bzr status
added:
a/
renamed:
a/? => b/? (re)
a/c/? => a/c/? (re)
$ bzr commit -q -m 'Divergent renames'
$ cd ..
$ hg convert source source-hg
initializing destination source-hg repository
scanning source...
sorting...
converting...
1 Initial layout
0 Divergent renames
$ hg -R source-hg st -C --change 1
A b/fa
a/fa
R a/fa
$ hg -R source-hg manifest -r 1
a/c/fc
b/fa
$ cd ..