tests/test-merge-combination-file-content.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:11:02 +0200
changeset 51583 22cc679a7312
parent 46266 e8b0c519dfb3
permissions -rw-r--r--
phases: move RemotePhasesSummary to revision number This continue our quest to align more logic on revision number instead of node-ids. The motivation is similar to the change to `new_heads` and `analyze_remote_phases` a few changeset earlier. Again, we take this as an opportunity to rename the class, and the attribute to the new naming scheme. This will highlight the need for code update for any code using it an expecting node-ids. Many of the rev-num → node-id conversion we had to introduce in the previous changesets can now be removed. More will be removed in the future as we continue to align code toward rev-num usage. time saved in the 100 milliseconds order of magnitude for the mozilla-try benchmark I have been using.

Testing recorded "modified" files for merge commit
==================================================

This file shows what hg says are "modified" files for a merge commit
(hg log -T {files}), somewhat exhaustively.

This test file shows merges that involves files contents changing

For merges taht involves executable bit changing, check test-merge-combination-exec-bytes.t

For testing of multiple corner case, check test-merge-combination-misc.t

Case with multiple or zero merge ancestors, copies/renames, and identical file contents
with different filelog revisions are not currently covered.

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/merge-combination-util.sh

All the merges of various file contents.

  $ range () {
  >   max=0
  >   for i in $@; do
  >     if [ $i = - ]; then continue; fi
  >     if [ $i -gt $max ]; then max=$i; fi
  >   done
  >   $TESTDIR/seq.py `expr $max + 1`
  > }
  $ isgood () { true; }
  $ createfile () {
  >   if [ -f a ] && [ "`cat a`" = $1 ]
  >   then touch $file
  >   else echo $v > a
  >   fi
  > }

  $ genmerges
  1111  : agree on ""
  1112  : agree on "a"
  111-  : agree on "a"
  1121  : agree on "a"
  1122  : agree on ""
  1123  : agree on "a"
  112-  : agree on "a"
  11-1  : hg said "", expected "a"
  11-2  : agree on "a"
  11--  : agree on ""
  1211  : agree on "a"
  1212  : agree on ""
  1213  : agree on "a"
  121-  : agree on "a"
  1221  : agree on "a"
  1222  : agree on ""
  1223  : agree on "a"
  122-  : agree on "a"
  1231 C: agree on "a"
  1232 C: agree on "a"
  1233 C: agree on "a"
  1234 C: agree on "a"
  123- C: agree on "a"
  12-1 C: agree on "a"
  12-2 C: hg said "", expected "a"
  12-3 C: agree on "a"
  12-- C: agree on "a"
  1-11  : hg said "", expected "a"
  1-12  : agree on "a"
  1-1-  : agree on ""
  1-21 C: agree on "a"
  1-22 C: hg said "", expected "a"
  1-23 C: agree on "a"
  1-2- C: agree on "a"
  1--1  : agree on "a"
  1--2  : agree on "a"
  1---  : agree on ""
  -111  : agree on ""
  -112  : agree on "a"
  -11-  : agree on "a"
  -121 C: agree on "a"
  -122 C: agree on "a"
  -123 C: agree on "a"
  -12- C: agree on "a"
  -1-1  : agree on ""
  -1-2  : agree on "a"
  -1--  : agree on "a"
  --11  : agree on ""
  --12  : agree on "a"
  --1-  : agree on "a"
  ---1  : agree on "a"
  ----  : agree on ""