tests/test-addremove-similar.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:54:19 +0200
changeset 51586 1cef1412af3e
parent 48031 5b89626c11e9
permissions -rw-r--r--
phases: rework the logic of _pushdiscoveryphase to bound complexity This rework the various graph traversal in _pushdiscoveryphase to keep the complexity in check. This is done though a couple of things: - first, limiting the space we have to explore, for example, if we are not in publishing push, we don't need to consider remote draft roots that are also draft locally, as there is nothing to be moved there. - avoid unbounded descendant computation, and use the faster "rev between" computation. This provide a massive boost to performance when exchanging with repository with a massive amount of draft, like mozilla-try: ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = hg.command.push # bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = default # bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default # benchmark.variants.explicit-rev = all-out-heads # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.protocol = ssh # benchmark.variants.reuse-external-delta-parent = default ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev before: 20.346590 seconds after: 11.232059 seconds (-38.15%, -7.48 seconds) ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev before: 24.752051 seconds after: 15.367412 seconds (-37.91%, -9.38 seconds) After this changes, the push operation is still quite too slow. Some of this can be attributed to general phases slowness (reading all the roots from disk for example) and other know slowness (not using persistent-nodemap, branchmap, tags, etc. We are also working on them, but with this series, phase discovery during push no longer showing up in profile and this is a pretty nice and bit low-hanging fruit out of the way. ### (same case as the above) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev pre-%ln-change: 44.235070 this-changeset: 11.232059 seconds (-74.61%, -33.00 seconds) # benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev pre-%ln-change: 49.234697 this-changeset: 15.367412 seconds (-68.79%, -33.87 seconds) Note that with this change, the `hg push` performance is now much closer to the `hg pull` performance, even it still lagging behind a bit. (and the overall performance are still too slow). ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-ds2-pnm # benchmark.variants.explicit-rev = all-out-heads # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.protocol = ssh # benchmark.variants.pulled-delta-reuse-policy = default # bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = rust ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 6.517450 hg.command.push: 11.219888 ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 10.160991 hg.command.push: 14.251107 ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog # bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default # benchmark.variants.explicit-rev = all-out-heads # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.protocol = ssh # benchmark.variants.pulled-delta-reuse-policy = default ## bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = default ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 8.577772 hg.command.push: 11.232059 ## bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = default ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 13.152976 hg.command.push: 15.367412 ## bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = rust ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-1-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 8.731982 hg.command.push: 11.178751 ## bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = rust ## benchmark.variants.revs = any-100-extra-rev hg.command.pull: 13.184236 hg.command.push: 15.620843

  $ hg init rep; cd rep

  $ touch empty-file
  $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file

  $ hg addremove
  adding empty-file
  adding large-file

  $ hg commit -m A

  $ rm large-file empty-file
  $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10,10000): print(x)' > another-file

  $ hg addremove -s50
  adding another-file
  removing empty-file
  removing large-file
  recording removal of large-file as rename to another-file (99% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

comparing two empty files caused ZeroDivisionError in the past

  $ hg update -C 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm empty-file
  $ touch another-empty-file
  $ hg addremove -s50
  adding another-empty-file
  removing empty-file

  $ cd ..

  $ hg init rep2; cd rep2

  $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file
  $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(50): print(x)' > tiny-file

  $ hg addremove
  adding large-file
  adding tiny-file

  $ hg commit -m A

  $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(70): print(x)' > small-file
  $ rm tiny-file
  $ rm large-file

  $ hg addremove -s50
  removing large-file
  adding small-file
  removing tiny-file
  recording removal of tiny-file as rename to small-file (82% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

should be sorted by path for stable result

  $ for i in `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     cp small-file $i
  > done
  $ rm small-file
  $ hg addremove
  adding 0
  adding 1
  adding 2
  adding 3
  adding 4
  adding 5
  adding 6
  adding 7
  adding 8
  adding 9
  removing small-file
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 0 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 1 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 2 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 3 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 4 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 5 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 6 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 7 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 8 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 9 (100% similar)
  $ hg commit -m '10 same files'

pick one from many identical files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ rm `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 0 as rename to a (100% similar)
  $ hg revert -aq

pick one from many similar files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ for i in `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     echo $i >> $i
  > done
  $ hg commit -m 'make them slightly different'
  $ rm `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove -s50
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 0 as rename to a (99% similar)
  $ hg commit -m 'always the same file should be selected'

should all fail

  $ hg addremove -s foo
  abort: similarity must be a number
  [10]
  $ hg addremove -s -1
  abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100
  [10]
  $ hg addremove -s 1e6
  abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100
  [10]

  $ cd ..

Issue1527: repeated addremove causes Abort

  $ hg init rep3; cd rep3
  $ mkdir d
  $ echo a > d/a
  $ hg add d/a
  $ hg commit -m 1

  $ mv d/a d/b
  $ hg addremove -s80
  removing d/a
  adding d/b
  recording removal of d/a as rename to d/b (100% similar)
  $ hg debugstate
  r   0          0 1970-01-01 00:00:00 d/a
  a   0         -1 unset               d/b
  copy: d/a -> d/b
  $ mv d/b c

no copies found here (since the target isn't in d

  $ hg addremove -s80 d
  removing d/b

copies here

  $ hg addremove -s80
  adding c
  recording removal of d/a as rename to c (100% similar)

  $ cd ..