--- a/tests/test-copies.t Mon Apr 29 14:38:54 2019 -0700
+++ b/tests/test-copies.t Thu Apr 11 23:22:54 2019 -0700
@@ -549,9 +549,6 @@
Grafting revision 4 on top of revision 2, showing that it respect the rename:
-TODO: Make this work with copy info in changesets (probably by writing a
-changeset-centric version of copies.mergecopies())
-#if no-changeset
$ hg up 2 -q
$ hg graft -r 4 --base 3 --hidden
grafting 4:af28412ec03c "added d, modified b" (tip)
@@ -560,15 +557,14 @@
$ hg l -l1 -p
@ 5 added d, modified b
| b1
- ~ diff -r 5a4825cc2926 -r 94a2f1a0e8e2 b1
+ ~ diff -r 5a4825cc2926 -r 94a2f1a0e8e2 b1 (no-changeset !)
+ ~ diff -r f5474f5023a8 -r ef7c02d69f3d b1 (changeset !)
--- a/b1 Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/b1 Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
b
+baba
-#endif
-
Test to make sure that fullcopytracing algorithm don't fail when both the merging csets are dirty
(a dirty cset is one who is not the descendant of merge base)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------